User talk:Aferistas

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. -- GraemeL ^(talk) 23:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. -- Renesis (talk) 00:27, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to add these links, whether through this account, or your IP address Special:Contributions/193.219.150.193. If you do, you will be blocked from editing. Please read WP:SPAM and WP:EL for more information. Linking to articles that were only created for advertising purposes also constitutes spamming. -- Renesis (talk)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. -- GraemeL ^(talk) 23:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. -- Renesis (talk) 00:27, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to add these links, whether through this account, or your IP address Special:Contributions/193.219.150.193. If you do, you will be blocked from editing. Please read WP:SPAM and WP:EL for more information. Linking to articles that were only created for advertising purposes also constitutes spamming. -- Renesis (talk)

About Invest Sign

Please, do not remove the deletion notice from this article. It is considered a form of vandalism. If you do remove it again, you run the risk of being blocked from editing wikipedia. Thanks! --Nehwyn 10:39, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Despite the warning, you have removed the deletion notice again. You had also removed the db notice twice before, without using the hangon tag. Please, cease. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nehwyn 10:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Despite warnings, you have removed the deletion notice twice again (four times total). Consider this:

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Nehwyn 10:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page!

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Nehwyn 10:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or comments from Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Invest Sign, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 11:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 11:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further violations will result in the increase of block period. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 11:10, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Aferistas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

193.219.150.193 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

repeated vandal

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aferistas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Linking to articles that were only created for advertising purposes also constitutes spamming in List of project management software", but there are other products which are there and they do not allow to add others because of double standarts or their own spamming links protection. I do not think that it is spam to add other project management software to list where are the others and some of them in low quality and notable.

Decline reason:

I'm upholding your block for attempting to evade the original block on this account using Arizona1 (talk • contribs) which is a violation of the Wikipedia:Sock puppetry policy. -- Netsnipe ► 16:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reasons for blocking

Hello Aferistas. Please, do keep in mind that you weren't blocked because of spamming, although you did receive warnings about that. You were blocked because:

you removed the AfD notice from an article you created, and that you did seven times, despite first being informed that it was not acceptable behaviour, and then receiving vandal warnings about it;
you repeatedly deleted the above-mentioned vandal warnings from your talk page;
you vandalised my user page and talk page, as well as that of User:Omicronpersei8 by pasting into them the vandal warnings you had cut from your own talk page.

Please, do read Wikipedia:Vandalism if you are not sure what "vandalism" means in Wikipedia jargon. We do welcome you as a new contributor to Wikipedia; just take this block period as a chance to do some reading up on Wikipedia policy pages, and I am sure you will quickly become an appreciated editor as soon as the block expires. Thanks! :) --Nehwyn 16:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Invest Sign

Please, do not repost material that has been just deleted as a result of an article for deletion debate. It is considered a form of Wikipedia:Vandalism. Thanks! --Nehwyn 15:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]