User talk:Aezagorski12

Welcome!

Hello, Aezagorski12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Fundamentals Gallery, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DFS454 (talk) 13:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Fundamentals Gallery

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DFS454 (talk) 13:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Communications Gallery

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Communications Gallery, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.hem-usa.org/wireless-telegraph-by-marconi.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:40, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Communications Gallery

A tag has been placed on Communications Gallery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DFS454 (talk) 13:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. Canterbury Tail talk 13:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Communications Gallery

A tag has been placed on Communications Gallery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DFS454 (talk) 13:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. DFS454 (talk) 13:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Galleries as articles

Please don't continue to create articles that are simply going to be deleted; that's a waste of your time and the time of others. In Wikipedia, galleries are part of articles (see, for example, Barnes Foundation), not separate articles. And we don't allow standard copyrighted images in articles, at all, except in very limited (fair use) cases, and even then, only at low resolutions. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 13:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Communications Gallery

A tag has been placed on Communications Gallery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Radiant chains (talk) 14:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Communications Gallery. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. DFS454 (talk) 14:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Early Radar Gallery

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Early Radar Gallery, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.hem-usa.org/radar-during-ww2.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Early Radar Gallery

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Radiant chains (talk) 14:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Under Seas Gallery

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Under Seas Gallery, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.hem-usa.org/under-seas-gallery.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Space Sensor Gallery

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Space Sensor Gallery, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.hem-usa.org/growth-in-space-electronics.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to National Electronics Museum, you will be blocked from editing. Radiant chains (talk) 14:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Space Sensor Gallery

A tag has been placed on Space Sensor Gallery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Acroterion _(talk) 14:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion _(talk) 14:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any further copyright violations of this kind after your block expires will result in a permanent block. Do not cut-and-paste text or images from external websites. Acroterion _(talk) 15:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Per Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs)'s request, I've unblocked you. I understand that she's advised you on our policies concerning copyrights and verbatim copying from other websites. Apart from the issues of copyright, we try to avoid the menu-of-links-to-other-pages format; there's enough room to describe the galleries without making readers click to see a stub article on the individual galleries, which taken individually, would not be considered notable under Wikipedia editorial policy. It's also best to simply rewrite sourced material to fit the encyclopedic format rather than copying and pasting. You might want to look over our manual of style. Please feel free to contact Moonriddengirl or myself with any questions. Acroterion _(talk) 16:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on National Electronics Museum. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Radiant chains (talk) 14:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality policy

Hi. I'm afraid that the text that you added to National Electronics Museum does not accord with our neutral point of view policy. Wikipedia does not pass judgment on whether experiences are "enjoyable" or if it serves as a "research haven." I have restored the neutral text for now. Please read over the linked neutrality policy. Material that analyzes the museum must be attributed to reliable, published sources that are not connected to the organization. If you have questions about this, please let me know. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to National Electronics Museum. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What I have added is not commentary. It is factual information from my boss about the Museum.

That something is "enjoyable" is commentary, I'm afraid. It's not "fact." --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]