User talk:Aeratbag13

Amanda J. Eliasch

The page seems designed simply to promote her work, none of which is linked to Wikipedia articles and is presumably non-notable Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:55, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

OK, I've unprotected to allow recreation Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Best to do a draft here initially Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

ROUGH DRAFT of Amanda Eliasch https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Aeratbag13/sandbox#Career

reply

Sorry for the delay, broadband down for a week. I've tidied it up a bit. Your refs will look better formatted like <ref>[url description]</ref> rather than just a bare url. Youtube and commercial sales sites like Amazon aren't suitable for sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Please remember to sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. I've formatted ref 4 to show you what I mean. Alternatively, you could use a template like ref 13, but that's a bit trickier. people don't like bare urls as references,it's worth tidying them. When you are ready, use the move tab to put your text back at the original title. Anyne can challenge an article, but it's now well reference and more neutral in tone, so you will just have to see how it goes Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:35, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Aeratbag13 (talk) 20:07, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Dear Jim, I am not good at these links and seem to be making more of a mess than anything else, I am going to be in New York and will ask a friend to help. Thank you so much for all your help. Everything is referenced just not the right way. Dare not put it up for Amanda Eliasch as there could be problems, I wish I understood.. I am sure it is easy, once shown. Sorry. Saw a heron today. stunning in Battersea---- Aeratbag13 (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[User:Sionk|Sionk]] (talk)Aeratbag13 (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC) I was banned by Callenac, I think unfairly. He accuses me of socket puppetry. I have no idea if this will get to you. The system here is so complicated. I explained to him fully that I had used two names as I had forgotten one. I was correcting Pete Cater's article which was accepted. His links were poor. So I helped him. I am sorry about that. Both Orangemike and Callenac were not at all helpful. Rather they called me fluff. Well nobody could be more fluffy than Micky Mouse or Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers. They both threw the book at me. I see that somebody else has started putting an article together who also seems blocked. Heavens, all I wanted to be was included in Wikipedia. I did not realist the level of politics. I thought I would be treated correctly and fairly. This is a bit of a joke, nobody has been so cruel as Wikipedia? How do you please everybody. I would have been a great editor in the art world. Semjadam I only met once, he asked for a photograph of me without any problems of I gave it to him and he uploaded in my house that is it. I have no interest in paying people as has been suggested. Why? There were enough people supporting me. Yellow bikini was a friend who though that Wikipedia was very harsh., she used my computer, as she was staying with me. I am totally shocked. I just needed to be explained with clarity what was correct and what was not. Incidentally I created the book British Artists at Work, which taught me the art world in Great Britain. I wanted to be of use. I was accepted three times, once I stayed up for 7 years with no problems. Then Jimbleak told me it was wrong a new version, so it was re done. Then it was accepted and I was changing links and it was taken down again. I really do not understand why when I have done so very much that I am treated like this? I know the coding was wrong and some pieces of press needed changing but really the editors were most unhelpful. Please help me if you can. AERATBAGiAERATBAGUser:Talk:AERATBAG]]

Your submission at AfC Amanda Eliasch was accepted

Amanda Eliasch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sionk (talk) 16:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)