User talk:Ae12079410
A tag has been placed on Anish Mistry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. FirefoxMan 22:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Excuse me
[edit]Why did you feel it necessary to remove the tags from Chester Zoo here? It has zero references and reads like a guide you might buy at the zoo itself. In other words, not a good article at all. It's a shame that such a great zoo has such a disappointing article. --Majorly 22:39, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
|
Anthony Trueman
[edit]Thank you for your suggestion regarding Anthony Trueman! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
then why did you take it off then, its really small considering he was a major character involved in many storylines.
Got to Have Your Love
[edit]you recently created the articlwe Got to Have Your Love. It does not meet wikipedias standards for an article concerning a single. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums how to properly create an article dealing with music releases. I have done some cleanup on the article but needs more work. --Tainter 23:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Should I Or Shoudnt I
[edit]I Recently discovered this website called ISIS it is basically a website which says how much of this animal a zoo has. Do you think I should start outting a list of zoos on the animal pages or is this a bad idea.
Ae12079410 17:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)