User talk:Ady111

Blastoyz

My dear friend, I hope you are fine. You are making it more likely, I believe, that this page will be deleted. You are adding unreliable sources, like Discogs. According to WP:ALBUM/SOURCE, Discogs is *NOT* a reliable source, because "info is user-submitted/uploaded and fails WP:USERG." You are also adding sources directly connected to the subject. If you keep going like this, the page will be so unreliable that I will feel compelled to recommend the Blastoyz page for deletion. You do not appear familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In particular, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. I hope this helps. Best regards, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:50, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello. I have looked up similar articles written about other artists of the same musical style and took some ideas ideas from there.

Using a citation from Discogs is meant to be an external link to the discography. I do not see how reliability has anything to do with this.

I believe you are making it impossible for people to add new articles, simply because you are unfamiliar with this musical genre. Blastoyz or Kobi Nigreker has millions of followers who will disagree with you and who believe he is a notable artist.

If you look up articles about other Trance music artists, you may come up with the same claims

.

I encourage you to lift the deletion discussion off this article, and give me and other Psy trance stakeholder to improve this article.

Many thanks and best regards Ady111 (talk) 09:06, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Blastoyz

Hello, Ady111, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username BoyTheKingCanDance, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Blastoyz, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blastoyz.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|BoyTheKingCanDance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:54, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Ok. Let's discuss this.

You say not in it's current form? Ok.

Since I have put considerable time into writing this article, please lift the deletion discussion and let me improve it.

How about that?

Btw

I edit many Wikipedia articles written in Hebrew mostly.

I and many others believe this person is a notable artist.

If the structure is the problem, let me fine tune it.

But let's not talk deletion.

Best regards

Adi Ady111 (talk) 09:17, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Boy TheKingCanDance

I hope you are welll.

Since the beginning of this initial discussion and the AfD for the Article "Blastoyz", I believe I have both established a reasonable claim for notability in accordance with the WP:GNG, as I have elaborated in the AfD discussion page- and have also laid the foundation for a good article.

Since no one is answering my claims on the AfD discussion page, I will appreciate closing the AfD discussion page.

If you feel that some information is still missing- please LMK.

Many thanks

Ady111 Ady111 (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]