Jump to content

User talk:Adw2000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tournament Brackets

[edit]

Thank you for making the changes to Template:16TeamBracket, Template:4TeamBracket, and Template:8TeamBracket. However, I have temporarily reverted your edits. Keep in mind that whenever you change the default values, it affects every single article it is used in.

You see, when I originally created those three templates, I designed them for the final round of various American sports organizations, like the National Basketball Association, the National Hockey League, and Major League Baseball, where the final round is a best-of-seven playoff — that is why we in the United States usually call them the finals, in the plural.

Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 16:08, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, in American English, it could be said that we generally use the term "finals" more than "final" when referring specifically to the the final stages of a sporting competition. If that is the case, then Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English should be followed. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 16:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, fair point. I did realise that this would affect all articles that use the template, but I was just being bold -- I thought it was a simple grammar mistake. I've reverted Template:32TeamBracket and Template:32TeamBracket-Compact as well. I guess users of the template can customise the headings, so it's no big deal. Thanks for keeping me right. Adw2000 08:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it looks like Template:32TeamBracket-Compact is currently only being used on the French Open and Wimbledon articles [1] so "final" without the "s" might be better on that one. It is the same situation with Template:Round16, which is primarily only used on 2006 FIFA World Cup and other football articles. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Call for consensus on fan site list on Andy Murray page

[edit]

Hello Adw2000,

You've probably noticed my (probably foolhardy) attempt to resolve the edit war on the Andy Murray page regarding fansites. The protagonists do not look about to resolve it among themselves, so I'd appreciate it if you and other regular editors could express your views on this part of the page, so that we can stop the war going forward, or at least block a protagonist who persists in it. Please come to the talk page here

The questions I've put are:

Please can I have the opinions of those who regularly edit this site:

1.Should there be a list of fansites?

2.Should it be ordered

a) alphabetically
b) by site's popularity or quality
c) by some other factor

3. If by popularity/quality how to judge this?

Thanks RobbieC 21:07, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Internet Tidal Wave memo, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/exhibits/20.pdf, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Internet Tidal Wave memo/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Internet Tidal Wave memo saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Group29 (talk) 17:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Sleaze

[edit]

The article Sleaze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page redirects from a general term 'sleaze' to a very particular use for it, thus being misleading. I propose having it deleted, and if anything, people who search for "Sleaze" will get the Political sleaze (UK politics) result.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. uKER (talk) 01:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sleaze listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sleaze. Since you had some involvement with the Sleaze redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). I removed the prod as, per WP:PROD redirects aren't eligable for prod. I do however agree with their reasoning so have taken to RfD. Dpmuk (talk) 09:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've yourself agreed that this redirect can be deleted, I suggest you add {{db-author}} to the redirect, to request a speedy deletion. Only you, as the page's original author, can do that. TJRC (talk) 19:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zeb Soanes

[edit]

The article Zeb Soanes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable continuity guy - fails WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ukexpat (talk) 18:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Adw2000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Adw2000. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ingenico page modification

[edit]

Hello We need to make some modifications related to the Ingenico page would you mind in letting us doing the modification ? Thanks Y. Yassine Mahfoufi (talk) 10:11, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the delay in replying - I'm only occasionally active on Wikipedia. Of course, please go ahead and make edits - you don't need my permission. I used to work for Ingenico over 15 years ago, but I don't have any particular authority on the page. Be Bold!! Adw2000 (talk) 10:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Adw2000&oldid=1175930710"