User talk:Adultnature1989
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Codyfinke (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Welcome!
Hello, Adultnature1989, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 23:04, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
[edit]Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Channel 4. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Alistair Stevenson (talk) 00:57, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello Adultnature 1989! I hope you'll take a look at the talk page of Darkness2005 who has a similar name to you, edited very similar articles to you and, like you, never used edit summaries. He refused to engage with the concerns of other editors and the result was that despite a lot of painstaking and valuable contributions to Wikipedia, his account was blocked. Hopefully, you'll agree to use your talk page to communicate with other people; perhaps you'll even use it to respond to this message by agreeing that you'll start using edit summaries to explain your intention in the subtle changes you are making to articles so that other editors don't hastily revert them? Alistair Stevenson (talk) 01:17, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with List of The Spoony Experiment episodes. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. —Half Price 20:16, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with List of The Spoony Experiment episodes. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. —Half Price 22:28, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Some comments
[edit]Just a few thoughts, since you edited so many articles today:
- 21 December 2010 or December 21, 2010, but never 21 December, 2010 [1] (see WP:MOS);
- In headings, most words are left uncapitalised
- Exact release dates of DVDs/VHS are entirely unneccessary. We're writing an encyclopedia here. But if you care enough to add them, go ahead, just it seems a little pointless.
Anyway, happy editing! - Jarry1250 [Who? Discuss.] 21:47, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from The Silver Chair (1990 TV Serial). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pol430 (talk) 21:24, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to The Silver Chair (1990 TV Serial). Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Pol430 (talk) 21:24, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Love Bites (band), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Gasheadsteve Talk to me 22:46, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Some of your edits to film articles have needed to be reverted today. Please not that IMDB is not a reliable source WP:RS/IMDB. It is a useful tool for finding stuff out, but information should not be directly sourced from it. Also, some of your edits to the information in the infobox have not been consistent with the guidelines (especially for release date and country) so please refer to the infobox guidelines at Template:Infobox film. Lastly you have also removed sourced information from some of the articles without giving a reason in the edit summary. Sourced information shouldn't be removed without being discussed first, unless it is clearly dated or irrelevant to the article. If it meets neither of those criteria, it is best to discuss the removal of sourced content on the talk page first. Betty Logan (talk) 00:50, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edit to the page The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 09:43, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Will you PLEASE abide by Wikipedia's policy of WP:Verifiability while editing? You made this edit to The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader. While it was correct you only provided a reference in one section, and changed the content in another section so it didn't match the accompanying references. It could be interpreted as vandalism and be reverted. So please include references for all content you alter. You have lots of messages left for you on this talk page so your actions are obviously causing concern, but you fail to engage with other editors, abide by editing guidelines or include edit summaries. Please be more responsible while editing. Betty Logan (talk) 10:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Channel 5
[edit]Please either do not make contentious moves and redirects, or participate in the discussion associated with them prior to making your edits. By offering a rationale it is less likely your contributions will be misconstrued and reverted. Alistair Stevenson (talk) 04:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Investigation
[edit]A sockpuppet investigation has been initiated against you. Please present your case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Darkness2005. Betty Logan (talk) 15:56, 15 December 2010 (UTC)