User talk:Adshead123

Unnecessary changes, breaking image links

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Ronnie Coleman, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing WP:MOS violations

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:53, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lord Voldemort, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 21:32, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jay Cutler, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.. And yes, The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds material. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 23:23, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm Flibirigit. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hazel McCallion have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Flibirigit (talk) 00:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Clancy's The Division 2. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 04:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 04:58, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joan Simone

Hello, Adshead123

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Joan Simone for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Thanks, Wikieditor019 (Talk to me) 17:44, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adshead123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wish to be unblocked i apologize i did make some good edits and bad ones but i learned my lesson

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Aoidh (talk) 17:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.