Jump to content

User talk:Adry0104

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. You have consistently added links to recipes for one site as references. Please stop. Count Count (talk) 09:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What link are your referring to? Adry0104 (talk) 15:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Links to cesarine.com, see https://spamcheck.toolforge.org/by-domain?q=cesarine.com Count Count (talk) 15:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see. It's a reliable source of info food-wise so I though it was ok referencing it. Adry0104 (talk) 15:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is by no means a reliable source. Count Count (talk) 16:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

[edit]

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tortellini, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 19:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Risotto alla milanese, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 10:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I re-edited the text adding the source. Hope this works! Thanks! Adry0104 (talk) 11:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Risotto alla milanese, you may be blocked from editing. -REDACTED403 (talk) 11:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please substantiate where my editing was disruptive and where I broke the neutral point of view policy? Adry0104 (talk) 12:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This edit violates both Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:No original research. The fact that most of your edits have been reverted should tell you something. Wikipedia is not a place to write personal essays or add your opinions on a subject. If you continue in this vein you do risk being blocked. Lard Almighty (talk) 12:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you read carefully why my edit to Risotto alla milanese was reverted back ("Please do not add or change content, as you did at Risotto alla milanese, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. "), you will understand why I added it again, this time with a source of information. So what's the problem now? The style in which it was written or what? You have to tell me why my edit violets the neutral point of view as I cited the source of info I used and why I am in breach of the Wikipedia:No original research, because that's not the case. Adry0104 (talk) 13:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is not written in a neutral tone. It is written like an essay, not an encyclopaedic article. If you can't tell the difference, perhaps you shouldn't be editing here. The citing is also inadequate. If you are going to cite a book you need to give the page(s) that the information you are relying on comes from. And generally one doesn't base a whole article on one book. So yes, what you wrote was original research. Essentially, you read a book and wrote an essay based on what you read. Lard Almighty (talk) 13:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, Adry0104!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I'm Dustfreeworld, one of the thousands of editors here. Below are some pages that you might find helpful:

While editing Wikipedia:

If you have any questions, check out the Teahouse or ask me on my talk page. Please sign your messages on discussion pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, welcome! ----Dustfreeworld (talk) 22:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]