User talk:AdrienneAAnderson

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome! My name is Cindamuse, and I'm one of the online ambassadors, a group of experienced Wikipedians who offer mentorship to newcomers. You don't need to read anything; you can just jump right in and try to improve Wikipedia. If you need help, you can talk with us right now, or can leave me a message on my user talk page. Have fun! Cind.amuse (Cindy) 10:42, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editing cheatsheet
Forgot how that code worked?

Summary of policies and guidelines
A quick reference for Wikipedia's "rules"

Find the page for your course
Forgot the link to your course's page?

Choose a mentor
Contact an ambassador to work with

Help with article assessment
Help us assess these articles!

Starting an article
Guide to starting your first article

Chat with us: Ask a question on the classroom IRC channel or on the regular help chat .
Are you on Facebook? Like Wikipedia on Campus for the latest news, photos, videos, and helpful tips.

Hello Adrienne, I am John and I am in your political parties class! (John C Daniels (talk) 21:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC))[reply]

hey

Hi Adrienne trying to get use to this see you in class Mcking4 (talk) 19:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, AdrienneAAnderson, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Sophus Bie ^(talk) 09:26, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Hi AdrienneAAnderson!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 23:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas Republican Party

I saw that you've selected Kansas Republican Party as the article you plan to work on, but I also noticed that all the recent edits to it are by someone who is not logged in. You can see the article history here. I don't know if that's you, but if it is you probably need to log in if you want your instructor to give you credit for the work. I've also left a note on your instructor's talk page. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:03, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I really appreciate the help. I was confused on how to incorporate the platforms and stances. This really helps. I will delete it tomorrow and redo it according to your guidelines. AdrienneAAnderson (talk) 08:18, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Issue with Kansas Republican Party

Hi -- the changes you've been making to Kansas Republican Party are problematic, I'm afraid. Take a look at Talk:Kansas Republican Party; I've left you a note there about the problems, and a suggestion on how to fix them. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:53, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I really appreciate the help. I was confused on how to incorporate the platform and stances, I understand now. I will delete everything I added tomorrow and start over according to your guidelines. AdrienneAAnderson (talk) 08:20, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

KRP again

It looks good. I don't know how you're being graded, so I can't tell you if you should add anything else, but what you've added so far is good material. The nice thing about a wiki is that others will come along later and add more. I fixed some formatting issues, and I'm sure if you wanted to make this an ongoing project we could think of more changes to make, but it's OK as it is, and the changes you've made have improved the article. If you plan to do more, let me know if I can help you figure out what can be added. I think we could probably expand the narrative history of the early years of the party, for example, but obviously it depends on what you need for your grade. I hope you enjoyed working on it! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:04, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]