User talk:Adrianreprap

This is Adrianreprap's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at RepRap Project instead.

The comment they left was:

This draft is a [[[WP:POVFORK]] of an already existing article - which is not allowed. You cannot create a draft that "competes" or is in dispute with an existing article. All involved editors must work on the existing article to reach a WP:CONSENSUS about the article content. If you need assistance to settle disagreements please see the Dispute resolution guide

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Adrianreprap/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Adrianreprap, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Dtpour.jpg

Not quite sure which is applicable here. I did indeed create the image myself using a screenshot, so that is how I have marked the copyright. However it is also a direct quotation from someone else, and so seems to be legitimate according to Wikipedia:Quotations. As there seem to be two independent routes to legitimacy, I am not sure if I should assert one, the other, or both...

Thanks for uploading File:Dtpour.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:45, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dtpour.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dtpour.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:03, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]