Jump to content

User talk:Adrian Malacoda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

BOO! ~Zowayix

test. --Abwayax (contribs :: talk) 21:58, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the Abwayax from trsrockin.com? -- PinkDeoxys 19:30, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Yes I am. Abwayax (contribs :: talk) 00:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pink FLoyd Rules Man!!! Redxiii121

Category:Dyslexic Wikipedians

[edit]

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wikipedians by mental condition. The is also a proposal to create an association to meet the needs of users with mental health conditions --Salix alba (talk) 18:26, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have just created an atheist wikiproject! It is still in its infancy, and will need some love before it starts to take shape. Please help in any way you can. Thanks, Hezzy 03:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

G/S/C Glitch City

[edit]

Umm...I'm the n_rox653 from your site, glitchcity.ath.cx. I have a different username here :P. Anyways, can you make a section on the G/S/C glitch city article here on Wikipedia? I made one, but apparently, some dumb noob that thought it was fake deleted what I wrote. >_<


WikBack

[edit]

Welcome to the WikBack! I just approved your registration, and I look forward to your contributions to the boards.

If you have no idea what this is about, or if you did not register, please contact me right away as the account may have been created by an imposter.

The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

For reverting vandalism on my userpage! 'Preciateit. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN that one guy who buried stuff 22:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pokemon Red Blue Glitch City

[edit]

Hi, you voted a while ago in favour of some mention of Glitch City in the Pokemon Red/Blue article. Unfortunately, despite admin saying a Glitch section would be ok, the main editor of the page is turning it into a war, constantly deleting it despite sources and Pokemon-culture relevance. If you have an interest in keeping this kind of interesting information in wikipedia, please come over to Pokemone Red and Blue and help get the small Glitches section reinstated. Regards, MKULTRA333 (talk) 19:43, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pedantry

[edit]

Actually, Rorschach does say, "The Watchmen. One of us was died tonight." in the film. That is one use of the term. hbdragon88 (talk) 04:39, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that's right... upon reading some pages on the Watchmen wiki, it does seem like that name was used at least once in the film. My bad! abwayax (contribs, talk) 04:57, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proprietary software

[edit]

Hi abwayax,

I was glad to see you started a discussion at Talk:Proprietary software. I noticed you're a software freedom enthusiast – that's cool! I've been working to improve the neutrality of this article and I'd be really happy to have your editing participation. It was written from a heavily FLOSS point of view and whatever someone's stance on how software should be, a POV-balanced explanation that adequately covers the important issues will be a big help to less informed readers. (I'm gradually implementing changes based on this draft.)

I look forward to working with you more! --Pnm (talk) 07:56, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Adrian Malacoda. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Adrian Malacoda. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Adrian Malacoda. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Adrian Malacoda. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]