User talk:Adonis7411

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Adonis7411! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Fettlemap (talk) 13:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

May 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly have I poorly sourced ? Please explain that... I'd love to get more insight. Adonis7411 (talk) 20:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. As part of this batch of edits you changed the number of members to something other than what the source said. You also added Trinitarios to the 'rival gangs' field, and added several people to the 'notable figures' field which were not supported in either the article itself or the linked articles.

Regarding the number of members, the source is pretty flimsy and out of date, but it's better than nothing. If you know of a reliable source, please use that, or propose it on the article's talk page.

For individual members, as one example, if you have a reliable source saying that King Von was a member of the gang, cite it, ideally at King Von.

Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 23:38, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have done nothing wrong in regard to editing. You are the one who continues to follow my page and delete vital gang information that I have inputted. I am going to ask you to stop following my page. Stop editing my work and refrain from using my username for any other purposes. Adonis7411 (talk) 06:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Rupert Murdoch did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 25stargeneral (talk) 18:19, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion

You reverted an edit of mine without an edit summary nor any comments on the talk page, which I specifically requested. What is your reason? You also appear to be in an edit war with another editor. Bearian (talk) 14:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An error was made in regard to your revision @Bearian. You may revert any changes made to your specific edit. Adonis7411 (talk) 14:36, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Bearian (talk) 14:36, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Poor user grammar

Users on Wikipedia use poor grammar to create a reference topic. When these references are corrected. Individuals lash out & request an explanation to edits that have common sense corrections.

These individuals behave in such a manner in order to maintain a status quo on Wikipedia. Preventing other users from properly editing, because of their continuous hounding. Adonis7411 (talk) 21:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]