User talk:Adelebahmani
June 2021
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Nizami Ganjavi International Center. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 06:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nizami Ganjavi International Center, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 06:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Adelebahmani (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here akalebel (talk) 10:35, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 11:12, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adelebahmani, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
- Kevo327 (talk) 11:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Adelebahmani (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked for no reason and intentionally. After stating that User talk:Kevo327 edits are biased and deleted sources then commented there is no source here, I have been mobbed by multiple accounts and have been blocked. Also, the question, why you have blocked all users with certain IPs if you are not biased. Sockpuppet investigations have not been even 30 minutes after some warning and I have been blocked as if I have been attached to 6 accounts?. I demand a notable investigation, as I can not even contradict the user and have been immediately blocked. I am working on 1 article at a time as I love to research then edit, while User:Kevo327 is can be considered r 5, deleting too many symbols even sources in one second and accusing me to block me out of his way. Though, I could also attract him/her to investigations and ask to block him/her for certain and valid reasons, which are obvious by looking at his/her edit history and his/her user profile, while I am doing just my work and not doing biased things. I can verify that I am a different person and please consider this.
Decline reason:
Confirmed sockpuppetry to JahJacob and Tami1996. Yamla (talk) 12:54, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi Adelebahmani! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 13:15, Thursday, July 15, 2021 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
x investigation
[edit]An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adelebahmani, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
- Kevo327 (talk) 07:18, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Adelebahmani (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I researched why you have opened the investigation and what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I promise to make better and productive contributions instead. Thank you for understanding. akalebel (talk)
Decline reason:
User is unresponsive. Yamla (talk) 12:27, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock discussion
[edit]Please state clearly how your editing was unconstructive and what you would do differently. What relationship do you have to Nizami Ganjavi International Center? When other editors tried to fix the article, why did you undo their edits? What other accounts have you used to edit? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)