User talk:Ade56facc

Welcome!

Hello, Ade56facc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Allan McInnes (talk) 16:59, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agitu Ideo Gudeta

Hi, aside from the nominator, you seem to be the main contributor to this page. We are trying to nominate it for a main-page appearance in the Did You Know section, but the continuing edits and reversions are going to keep this on hold for a while. What do you think? Does the article need any more work, or can it be left alone for a while so it can be featured? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:03, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the delayed answer. Yes, I think that the article can be featured and that we can freeze it for at least a month because I guess that the response and confirmation of autopsy results will not be publicy availabe before March or April 2021. Maybe a notice about not touching the contents of the article might be useful to other contributors. Ade56facc 18:14, 06 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Web server

Regarding a 404 response in an overload condition, the book citation you've restored does not appear to say that it's "inappropriate," and it is not. A server can return a 404 response whenever circumstances at the time of the request prevent it from determining that a representation of the resource exists. 73.71.251.64 (talk) 19:02, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

XMLHttpRequest

FYI there is an edit war at XMLHttpRequest between myself and Timhowardriley. Among the points of contention:

Timhowardriley disputes the description of XHR as an "API". I referred to the standard that says it is one. He is indifferent.
I noted significant points of misinformation in the section that describes XHR methods (which also frequently strays from the topic at hand). I replaced that section with a general example of using XHR. Timhowardriley reverted that with little comment.
A year ago Timhowardriley removed existing sections about CORS and Fetch API on the basis that they were not "essential" then added sections focusing on server-side technology and code examples that, in my view, are quite poor (e.g. one sends a DELETE request without a URL.) I removed those examples and restored the CORS and Fetch sections. He has reverted.

2601:642:4600:D3B0:9111:FF68:B849:3D9B (talk) 14:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]