User talk:Adcoffman55

This is Adcoffman55's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berea, Kansas (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Karnataka was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires sources that prove that the subject is deserving for an article - current sources seem to be blog-like posts describing the place rather than explaining its significance.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Berea, Kansas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Karnataka (talk) 20:04, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adcoffman55! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Karnataka (talk) 20:04, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Adcoffman55! Your additions to Berea, Kansas have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Berea, Kansas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Berea, Kansas. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Your edit to Berea, Kansas has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Adcoffman55. Thank you for your work on Appanoose, Kansas. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Adcoffman55. Thank you for your work on Forrest Home, Kansas. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:04, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Berea, Kansas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Berea, Kansas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berea, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have don’t a lot of research on this Ghost town. There are many historical maps showing that Berea existed in Franklin Coutny as well as an archived post office and even a college published research paper giving great detail on the town. Adcoffman55 (talk) 06:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done* not don’t. My apologies. Adcoffman55 (talk) 06:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Making more GNIS mess

Please do not source new articles to the GNIS and thereby add to the huge mess, that there already is in Wikipedia that has already taken years of cleanup effort by many editors, because of this unreliable and fault-filled computer database. Find proper sources like actual history books and do not source to the GNIS at all.

It will make things a lot simpler for you in the long run, because there is a lot of editorial resistance to the GNIS, up to and including outright Arbitration Committee cases, once we discovered that the world already knew that it was flawed years ago (before the Wikipedia editorship learned of this) and the huge amount of outright lies that Wikipedia now has that we are still discovering by the shedload years later.

Uncle G (talk) 09:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Making Wikipedia pages are hard enough. Surely the edit is easy. But no. I just tried fixing that GNIS issue and it ruined the whole page. I’ve done extensive research finding these forgotten towns in Franklin County. I tried my best to make these pages and all I am getting is attacked for it by people who probably do not live within 1000 miles of Kansas. No one has been helpful at all on this page. Adcoffman55 (talk) 15:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bowling Green, Kansas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bowling Green, Kansas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bowling Green, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are historical maps claiming the town once existed as well as evidence that there was a post office in the town for a short time. Adcoffman55 (talk) 20:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Appanoose, Kansas, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you were trying to be helpful with that edit, but you removed a swath of infobox formatting and thereby ruined page readability. Please be in the habit of using Preview, as it will reveal such errors immediately. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 22:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the good advice. My apologies for the mess up. I’m pretty new. You’re the first one to give me actual advice instead of harassing me. Adcoffman55 (talk) 22:28, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear that's been your experience, but I can definitely relate. It's not the most user-friendly (or just friendly) site. I'm utterly self-taught and no expert, but if you ever run into trouble with formatting or the like, feel free to drop me a line and I'll see if I can help. Cheers, Jessicapierce (talk) 00:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hackett, Kansas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hackett, Kansas, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hackett, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Coburn, Kansas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coburn, Kansas, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coburn, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pansy, Kansas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pansy, Kansas, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pansy, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of McCandless, Kansas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article McCandless, Kansas, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McCandless, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pleasant Hill, Kansas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pleasant Hill, Kansas, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pleasant Hill, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dennison, Kansas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dennison, Kansas, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennison, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Forrest Home, Kansas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Forrest Home, Kansas, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forrest Home, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Appanoose, Kansas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Appanoose, Kansas, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appanoose, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Greenwood, Kansas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greenwood, Kansas, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenwood, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]