User talk:Adbhonsle

Welcome!

Hi Adbhonsle! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 08:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Parshurama

Could you summarise what sort of information you want to add to the Parshurama. Do you want to add information about living descendants or family? (People alive today that are descendant from Parshurama.) Or something else? Nil Einne (talk) 14:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nil Einne The whole article is incomplete. Legends from epics & overall view on Avatar is only focused on warrior aspect of Parshurama. There is benevolent side which is missing. Adbhonsle (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nil Einne Seems to be quotes from the Mahabharata. Doug Weller talk 10:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General sanctions alert for Southeast Asian social groups

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 09:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller

Agree with what you are saying, but there is lot of incomplete details in article. In couple of days I'll update it. I would support restrictions if anything of that sort happens in future.

Thanks for support. 🙏 Adbhonsle (talk) 13:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't looked much at your edits, but I will say make sure whatever you add is supported by reliable sources. These should generally be secondary sources. Citing stuff directly to primary sources including the texts where Parashurama appears needs to be done with great care and should be very limited. It doesn't matter how sure you are something is correct, you need sources. Second, I'd urge you not to touch anything about living or other recent descendants of Parashurama be it individuals or groups who claim such descent. While I personally have doubts anything like this belongs in our article, even if it does belong your inexperience means you're not the editor who should be adding it. Stick to adding more basic stuff. Nil Einne (talk) 20:58, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nil Einne The sources cited in article are English Translation done by East India Company during Colonial Rule. They are incorrect due to misinterpretion(lack of knowledge) of Sanskrit Language. I have taken most of info from English Translation of the Purananas. I will cite them with those, some are avaliable on archive.org.

Appreciate your concern and support 🙏 Adbhonsle (talk) 07:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adbhonsle That's what you were told not to do. Find sources meeting RS that are not the Purananas. Doug Weller talk 08:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd add that if there is a lot of existing content cited directly to English translations Purananas from any period, then it would likely be acceptable to remove this content. It would be better if instead of just removing it, you find other sources that are not the Puarananas and add content based on them. However removing poorly sourced content is often acceptable. Trying to fix a poorly sourced article by adding more or different poorly sourced content doesn't generally help. Note the important distinction here, this needs to be content sourced directly to the Purananas. If the content is sourced to secondary sources then even if you feel these secondary sources rely on outdated translations you need take a lot more care in removing it. Perhaps open a discussion on the talk page explaining why you feel this content should be removed despite being sourced to secondary sources. If you don't get any response, it might be an option to ask at WP:RSN with a focus on whether these sources are old enough that they are no longer reliable. Whatever you do, I'd suggest you start slow. Again, it will be a lot easier if you find substantially newer or "better" secondary sources you that you want to use instead and are able to explain why these sources are better perhaps pointing to differences or even better scholarly articles which have reviewed or assessed these "better" secondary sources. Nil Einne (talk) 11:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]