User talk:Adarrah

This is Adarrah's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Their own works cannot be considered as independent references for them. We need more reliable sources independent of the subject for this to pass

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Adarrah/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jupitus Smart 03:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Adarrah, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jupitus Smart 03:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Helen-Camera.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Helen-Camera.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Frank-Shades.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Frank-Shades.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Helen and Frank-TortugaMcKinley copy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Helen and Frank-TortugaMcKinley copy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Helen and Frank-Greece.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Helen and Frank-Greece.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Helen and Frank Schreider

Hello Adarrah. Thanks for your message on my talk page. There are a couple of issues with that draft which I think you need to be aware of. The first, is the style of writing and the content itself. It would be fine as a magazine article, but it really is very inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Despite my comments at Draft talk:Helen and Frank Schreider, it is still loaded with evaluative words and phrases, attribution of emotions, etc.. There is also the problem that it seems to contain information which you have obtained from the subject (Helen Schreider) directly, but which does not appear to have been published anywhere. For example, that quote from Georgia O'Keeffe about Helen's paintings and the assertions that "They established a good rapport" and that Helen did a painting of Georgia O’Keeffe... Is any of that supported by the reference that is provided Helen Schreider (September 1974). "An American artist looks at the Middle East" Al Majal Magazine, or does it simply support the fact that she wrote an article about Georgia O'Keeffe? Even that cannot be verified from the title of the article and there are no page numbers. The second issue is the proposed film about her which is still seeking financing. I don't think that's appropriate for the article either at this stage. It's really only relevant if the film is actually released and independently reviewed. This brings me to my next concern, if you are in any way connected to this proposed film, you have a clear conflict of interest and you need to read this page for guidance when editing under those circumstances. Voceditenore (talk) 17:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Ushuaia wsign.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Ushuaia wsign.jpeg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helen and Frank Schreider (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seraphimblade was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A lot of the fluffy prose ("It was love at first sight", "epic journey", "no small dream!" (don't use exclamation marks), "prestigious body", etc.), needs toned down for neutrality in tone. Also, first names should be avoided when possible, "the Schreiders" would be preferable when both are referred to. First names can be used when necessary to disambiguate one from the other.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Helen and Frank Schreider and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Helen and Frank Schreider, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 22:26, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helen and Frank Schreider (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SeraphWiki was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Helen and Frank Schreider and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Helen and Frank Schreider, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SeraphWiki (talk) 04:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Helen and Frank Schreider has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Helen and Frank Schreider. Thanks! SeraphWiki (talk) 04:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Helen and Frank Schreider has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Helen and Frank Schreider. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 17:35, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helen and Frank Schreider has been accepted

Helen and Frank Schreider, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 07:51, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to insert a better photo of Frank Schreider, a photo that had been given to me by Helen Schreider, who had taken the photo. The photo is identified as FrankScan 2.pdf . In editing, I deleted the original photo, but I have been unable insert the new photo.

Could someone help me please.