User talk:Adamstanton

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Stntn (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adamstanton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never had an account with the username "Stntn" and have never had a Wikipedia account in the past. Please unblock me as I did not create this account as a sock puppet. Once again, this is my first account and I have only positive intentions to help improve the Wikipedia community with my contributions. Thank you for your time and I again ask that this block be removed. NOTE: I am pasting the text from my new request to be unblocked as I am not sure where to put that information. It appears that someone else had an account with the username "adamstanton" which is now "Stntn" and that person appears to be banned. I assure you that I am not that person. I simply created this username because that is my name. If you would like me to change it I am glad to do so but, again, I did not create this account as a "sock puppet" and have never had a Wikipedia account before. It appears that the problem is that someone else had this username and acted maliciously. As I've said, my intentions are to make positive contributions to Wikipedia. I intend only to volunteer my knowledge and time to help improve the Wikipedia pages. Please unblock me. If for some reason you do not trust me than I ask that you allow me one day of being unblocked to evaluate my actions and edits and you will see that I have only good intentions and actions. Thank you. P.S: I didn't know how to respond to your comment: "Please see deleted contributions." so I typed this in a new unblock request.

Decline reason:

Per review of deleted contribs as noted below. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reviewing admin: Please see deleted contributions. T. Canens (talk) 03:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adamstanton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It appears that someone else had an account with the username "adamstanton" which is now "Stntn" and that person appears to be banned. I assure you that I am not that person. I simply created this username because that is my name. If you would like me to change it I am glad to do so but, again, I did not create this account as a "sock puppet" and have never had a Wikipedia account before. It appears that the problem is that someone else had this username and acted maliciously. As I've said, my intentions are to make positive contributions to Wikipedia. I intend only to volunteer my knowledge and time to help improve the Wikipedia pages. Please unblock me. If for some reason you do not trust me than I ask that you allow me one day of being unblocked to evaluate my actions and edits and you will see that I have only good intentions and actions. Thank you. P.S: I didn't know how to respond to your comment: "Please see deleted contributions." so I typed this in a new unblock request.

Decline reason:

Already declined this above. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It appears that someone else had an account with the username "adamstanton" which is now "Stntn" and that person appears to be banned. I assure you that I am not that person. I simply created this username because that is my name. If you would like me to change it I am glad to do so but, again, I did not create this account as a "sock puppet" and have never had a Wikipedia account before. It appears that the problem is that someone else had this username and acted maliciously. As I've said, my intentions are to make positive contributions to Wikipedia. I intend only to volunteer my knowledge and time to help improve the Wikipedia pages. Please unblock me. If for some reason you do not trust me than I ask that you allow me one day of being unblocked to evaluate my actions and edits and you will see that I have only good intentions and actions. Thank you. P.S: I didn't know how to respond to your comment: "Please see deleted contributions." so I typed this in a new unblock request.