User talk:Adampiette

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ágnes Lehóczky.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 21:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ágnes Lehóczky concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ágnes Lehóczky, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 12:23, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Ágnes Lehóczky

Hello Adampiette. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Ágnes Lehóczky.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ágnes Lehóczky}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hasteur (talk) 23:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ágnes Lehóczky

Thank you for improving Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ágnes Lehóczky. Could you please add references about her and her work, including book reviews or biographical articles? Eastmain (talk • contribs) 12:57, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Piette 14.10, 31 October 2013: I actually have done with the improvements - the external refs include a long chapter analysis of her work, for instance. The six references I have added are all new. On comparable pages I note that six refs is the norm. Do you want more?

These two substantial reviews, one in Hungarian, one a whole chapter of an academic monograph, are already referenced:

Ferencz Győző, Körvonalak az episztemológiai ködben, ‘Contours in the Epistemological Fog’ - Review of Ágnes Lehócykz, Poetry, The Geometry of Living Substance, Cambridge Scholars, 2010. - in (Holmi, February, 2013) http://www.holmi.org/2013/02/ferencz-gyozo-korvonalak-az-apisztemologiai-kodben-agnes-lehoczky-poetry-the-geometry-of-the-living-substance-four-essays-on-agnes-nemes-nagy

Zoe Skoulding, ‘Ágnes Lehóczky and the Palimpsestic City’ in Zoe Skoulding, Women’s Poetry and Urban Space: Experimental Cities, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, ISBN: 978-0-230-29278-9, ISBN10: 0-230-29278-X, http://us.macmillan.com/contemporarywomenspoetryandurbanspace/ZoeSkoulding

Your submission at AfC Ágnes Lehóczky was accepted

Ágnes Lehóczky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 15:45, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Adampiette, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Ágnes Lehóczky have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:31, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]