User talk:Acts0412

Speedy deletion of Acts 2:38 salvation by grace through faith

A tag has been placed on Acts 2:38 salvation by grace through faith, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wildthing61476 14:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Acts 2:38 salvation by grace through faith

A tag has been placed on Acts 2:38 salvation by grace through faith, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wildthing61476 14:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Pastor Gary Reckart.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Pastor gary reckart.jpg. The copy called Image:Pastor gary reckart.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Apostolic Messianic Church

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Apostolic Messianic Church, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Apostolic Messianic Church seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Apostolic Messianic Church, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 12:30, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harold Wallace Rosenthal

If you have an issue with the accuracy of content in a Wikipedia article, you're certainly free to remove it. The thing about Wikipedia is that since absolutely anybody can edit it, there's always the risk of people adding bad or improperly referenced information that's either questionable or wrong. But you are not at liberty to insert new text into the article that specifically criticizes Wikipedia or individual Wikipedia editors for the disputed information; just remove the disputed text and leave it at that. Bearcat (talk) 03:24, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pastor Gary Reckart.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pastor Gary Reckart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

fyi, re:myth

First off, I am a definite Christian, so there is no need to accuse me of atheism. Now to say - I do not find the use of "myth" to refer to the creation narrative insulting. A myth, properly defined, is a "story with supernatural elements pertaining to the origins and/or development of a religion or philosophy that may or may not be true". It was, in fact, a nun that provided me with this definition. There is no implication of falseness as most people assume, so there is no need to take offense.

I must also say that editing in this manner will result in a rather quick blocking of your account. If you want the term changed, gain a consensus and do it that way. Part of the reason there is no consensus against use of the term myth is that editors like you, show up, get frustrated, break the rules, get blocked for it, and thus are no longer around to support it's removal, so a consensus against it cannot be built.Farsight001 (talk) 01:14, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Patripassianism. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Robofish (talk) 21:47, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]