User talk:ActiveUgar
March 2018
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Unblock
[edit]
ActiveUgar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I wonder why this wikipedia is even called a free encyclopedia ! anyone here can edit any article without even creating an account, yet some editors want to genuinely contribute so they create an account ! I can simply edit whatever I like without a registered account, yet I chose to edit by creating one ! Then, you ban me for good as you claim that I do disruptive edits. Can anyone show me one single edit that I did here that vandalized this platform !! I used sources for every edit I did, yet this NinjaRobotPirate is allowed to blindly rollback all my edits ! If my edits were disruptive and not contributing, so why has no one reverted each edit by itself instead of this mass rollback madness ? I kindly ask to have one account and you can monitor my actions. Then, if I do anything disturbing, you can ban me and I would retire from doing anything here. As you can see my edits are only about sports and history, so why should I be punished forever ?! ActiveUgar (talk) 20:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You created this account to evade a block on a previous account (or several previous accounts). Block evasion will see the new account blocked, too. You should contest the block on your original account. Huon (talk) 20:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ActiveUgar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I want this account, it is a new one. You always try to put me in closed circles ! I only demand for this one account for a fresh start. You can check my edits if they were positive or not! I do not like answers about other accounts. You say that you ban sockpuppets for not affecting a vote .. I do not care about that ! Why should I be banned from editing about sports ?! check my edits regarding European Cup and UEFA Champions League records and statistics and Kawkab, Rif Dimashq. Don't I deserve a chance to redeem myself? Here it is only about contributing, you can revert my edits if they were wrong but banning me for good, that is very very unfair ! Hope you accept this request and I promise to keep this only account ! ActiveUgar (talk) 21:52, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You can "redeem yourself" by not continuing to violate Wikipedia policy (and the trust of the community) through the incessant creation of new accounts. You can try for the standard offer, but you will need to do so from your original account. Talk page access revoked as there is no way this account will be unblocked. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:59, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.