User talk:Actionz

Over-broad see alsos

Howdy hello! I see you have taken an interest in see alsos. However, some of your additions have been overly broad and have been undone. You can take a look at [1] for a more full overview of how they work. I'll add that usually just the most relevant links are kept in the see also, so as not to clog or clutter them. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 03:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary Phinney von Olnhausen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mill. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Alexandria, Virginia into Old Town Alexandria. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Adventures of an Army Nurse in Two Wars

Hello, Actionz,

Thank you for creating Adventures of an Army Nurse in Two Wars.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article! Though, notability, which decides what articles are suitable for Wikipedia, is IMHO not met, including WP:GNG (general notability) and WP:NBOOK (book notability). The in popular culture series refs are basically where Mary Phinney is a character, completely unrelated to the book. I also managed to find a couple of other books, though they don't meet the requirement that to be notable (GNG), a topic needs to have multiple reliable significant independent references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang 04:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Actionz. Thank you for creating Alexandria Archaeology Museum. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I have removed the copyright violations from this article you created. Please do not copy and paste content you find on the internet, you need to use your own words, and provide attribution. The article needs citations to back up the claims.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 13:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]