User talk:ActingEditor

August 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Mark Deutrom. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Martin451 (talk) 23:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Mark Deutrom. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 23:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mark Deutrom, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Nja²⁴⁷ 07:03, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. Here are the reverts in question. William M. Connolley (talk) 07:04, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mark Deutrom, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 14:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)