User talk:Achler

Reverts

I reverted most of your attempts, several malformed, to link your new article. It would be better to work on the article first; it needs to citations to establish notability. See WP:NOTE. Dicklyon (talk) 08:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Regulatory Feedback Networks

The article Regulatory Feedback Networks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The topic is probably too new to find notability support in secondary sources. The only sources listed are primary sources by the guy who wrote the article (assuming the matching names means what it appears to mean).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dicklyon (talk) 08:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Regulatory feedback network

I have nominated Regulatory feedback network, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regulatory feedback network. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dicklyon (talk) 08:39, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]