User talk:Achishol

Welcome!

Hello, Achishol, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Ronz (talk) 16:29, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest policy

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. [1] --Ronz (talk) 16:29, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please take a moment to read this?

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 16:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC) - Thanks! --Ronz (talk) 16:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

The recent edit you made to The Society for Clinical Ophthalmology constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. –Capricorn42 (talk) 17:16, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Clinical Ophthalmology (the journal). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. –Capricorn42 (talk) 17:16, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 18:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note to other editors and Achishol : Achishol appears to have a clear WP:COI with editing The Society for Clinical Ophthalmology and Clinical Ophthalmology (the journal). I think the deletions by Achishol were just some good faith attempts to try to rectify the coi problems. If anyone wants to delete these articles, WP:SPEEDY or WP:PROD would be the appropriate ways to do so. --Ronz (talk) 19:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Am not sure if this is how to respond to these alerts (I'm afraid I'm new to Wikipedia). Jan 27 was the first time I've ever really used the site and was requested to do so to post factual information about a new ophthalmology society. I work with the society and we'd noticed that other societies appear in Wikipedia. We had not intended for it to appear as advertising and only supplied information about Clinical Ophthalmology (the journal) to help demonstrate notability of the society posting (by showing support for the society from an external body), not to create a conflict of interest. I suppose notability is difficult to demonstrate when something is new. However the existence of the society is factually accurate as are its aims and objectives, and we hope that its existence is of note and of interest to practitioners in eye care and to patients. In saying that, I am happy to take on board any suggestions for how to remedy the situation. My apologies (Achishol (talk) 11:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for responding. Both articles need multiple, independent, reliable sources that demonstrate notability of the subject. Otherwise they can be deleted or reduced to a minimal article. Given that both the journal and especially the society are fairly new, this it be difficult to find such sources, so a minimal article (stub) is probably the best solution for now. --Ronz (talk) 16:27, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I've created a stub for the society now. Hopefully that's a better approach. The article can then be removed if it's not deemed to be notable [[[User:Achishol|Achishol]] (talk) 17:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC)]

IIIIn particular , we need memebership for the society, and circulartion or readership for the journal. We also need 3rd party independent reliable published sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases, or material based on press releases) that talk about ether. DGG (talk) 10:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]