User talk:Acham

Welcome!

Hello, Acham, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 16:21, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary Bios

Acham, please try to use the preview button more often, it often helps. Also, dont forget to make your talk page so others can know more about you and what articles they may find you writing on Wikipedia. Additionally, make sure that all bios are professional and if a page is deleted, do not redo it- with a few extenuating circumstances. DTfromDC 23:42, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hurst article

Acham, I appologize for my grumpiness. ill help you on that article when i get some time. good luck with it. there may be a broken link on [[moran]'s page for hurst as well. just remember , no origional research. dtfromdc

Jen Safavian

Acham, I noticed your post on Jen Safavian. Although I know that it does list her as the chief counsel, that is false. I was down at that committee 3 times last week alone and I personally know a good deal of the staffers in that committee from meeting them at different political functions. She isn't at the bottom; however, she isn't the chief counsel(She never was to this date either). She is one of twelve according to the Committee on Government Reform.

+ Thanks; I see that now here. That means her bio is incorrect. I'll fix it. If I'm not fast enough, feel free to do so. Thanks for letting me know. Acham 15:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting comments of others on an article's talk page

Acham - I've restored the comments you deleted at Talk:Thomas M. Davis. I'm assuming that either (a) this was an inadvertent mistake, or (b) you intended to archive them but didn't complete the process.

If you did intend to delete the text, please let me know why. Thanks. John Broughton 20:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I intended to archive them because a note was displayed that the comment page was too long. I was thinking that the comments would archive like page edits and I could just go to an older version. I'll spend more time on the instuctions before I try that again. Thanks for the chance to explain.Acham 06:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. You're right that older comments are still available via an older version of the talk page, but that isn't considered a good way for someone looking for old comments to find them (or even to know they are there). Rather: Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page (a misleading title, in my opinion: it should be "How to archive part of a talk page"). John Broughton 14:52, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons:

The block on that IP address has been converted to anon-only -- you should be able to edit once logged in. Sorry for the trouble.

Request handled by: Luna Santin 00:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gov Reform Committee

Acham, lets come to an agreement on what is acceptable for the Gov. Reform Committee on Tom Davis.

" He became the Chairman in 2003. Previous to becoming the chair of the full committee, Davis was the chair of a subcommittee until 2002 when he stepped down after a series of legislative victories. As Chair of the Government Reform Committee, since 2004, he has led a total of 256 hearings which resulted in saving US taxpayers 6.5 billion dollars. ^[1]"

What parts of that are not suitable? They are all facts and describe how he came to be the chair. I know its not what the Washington Post suggested in their article, but because he was chair of the sub-committee is how he came to be in line.DTfromDC 01:47, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DT - without taking sides here, a press release from the office of Tom Davis is an acceptable source for when he became chair, and the number of hearings held. But as for "series of legislative victories" and "saving US taxpayers 6.5 billion dollars", those need something meeting WP:V criteria; the word of Tom Davis or his staff isn't acceptable. The second claim COULD be kept in by saying "which he said resulted in saving ... "; his making the claim is newsworthy. (I wouldn't suggest a similar approach for the first situtation: wording like this is just too weird: "after what he said were a series of legislative victories". John Broughton | Talk 12:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with above; this is a Davis press release. (1) "After a series of legislative victories" is all PR. Even if he did have a string of victories, which he is NOW distancing himself from, by the way, what were they? What constitues a "series" -- 2? (2) As to the number of hearings and the savings, Davis has held fewer hearings than any previous chair, so that number of 256 without a denominator is meaningless. The Democrats on his committee have a list of almost 60 hearings on their wesbsite they have asked him to start. Finally, the savings is a number without serious support. How much did he WASTE by refusing Waxman's requests to hold hearings on Oil companies, Katrina contractors, Iraq, at the other 56 hearings they requested? A story in the Post on Sunday mentions a Unisys contract that is subject to Davis oversight that is overspending by $1 Billion. Katrina cost $100 Billion. Iraq spending is at $338 Billion. Can we subtract those numbers from his self-serving claims?

If you have something you want to put in your own words, please propose it.

Andrew Hurst

User:Thadeus856/templates/badlink

Copyright violation

Please do not copy and paste text that is copyrighted, as you did with Benjamin Holman. Your contributions must be in your own words. Thank you. BuddingJournalist 01:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help

I did attribute it. But I was too tired to re-write it. Hopefully it is a good start.Acham 06:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Hurst nominated for deletion

The article which you began on Andrew Hurst has been nominated for deletion. You might want to join the discussion. --Kevin Murray 21:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)==Image copyright problem with Image:Qualsystem1.gif==[reply]

Image Copyright problem

Hi Acham!
We thank you for uploading Image:Qualsystem1.gif, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 01:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrew Hurst

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Andrew Hurst, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Raven1977 (talk) 20:39, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Andrew Hurst

I have nominated Andrew Hurst, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Hurst (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Raven1977 (talk) 04:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Acham. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:David L. Carrasco (athletic director) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:David L. Carrasco (athletic director), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Acham. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:David L. Carrasco (athletic director) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:David L. Carrasco (athletic director), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David L. Carrasco (athletic director)

Hello, Acham. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David L. Carrasco".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 12:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Acham. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Acham. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of journalists killed in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John McNamara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John McNamara, sportswriter (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

wikipedia and social media should not be used as sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John McNamara, sportswriter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John McNamara, sportswriter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Acham! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 18:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From Achamb 14 April 2020 14:45 Eastern Time:

Thank you for your quick review. This draft article has 33 references, and none of them are Wikipedia references. I'm afraid I have no idea what you mean by this conclusion. I did mark internal links where applicable. Did you think those were references? There are 33 other references on my submitted draft, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:John_McNamara,_sportswriter.

I'm sure I can fix it once I understand why these references aren't considered references. Thank you

Acham (talk) 18:28, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Acham (talk) 18:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick review. This draft article has 33 references, and none of them are Wikipedia references. I'm afraid I have no idea what you mean by this conclusion. I did mark internal links where applicable. Did you think those were references? There are 33 other references on my submitted draft, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:John_McNamara,_sportswriter. I'm sure I can fix it once I understand why these references aren't considered references. Thank you

Your submission at Articles for creation: John McNamara, sportswriter (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John McNamara, sportswriter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John McNamara, sportswriter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 19:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John McNamara, sportswriter (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please list WP:THREE best sources that cover his life in detail that aren't obituaries or from his own writing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John McNamara, sportswriter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John McNamara, sportswriter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John McNamara (sportswriter) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John McNamara (sportswriter), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 09:14, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John McNamara, sports reporter

Hello, Acham. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John McNamara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John McNamara (sportswriter)

Hello, Acham. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John McNamara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:58, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:HurstAndrew.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HurstAndrew.jpg, which you've attributed to Mary Dotson. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^ [1]

[Oversight_That_Benefited_All_Americans-1] [1]

[1]