User talk:AcePuppy

List of social networking websites

Acepuppy, why did you remove Eventful?

Why do you insist on removing Vox? That is the only place that caters to what people REALLY want out of a social networking website! I demand that you stop it. Kapn Korea 06:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Please use proper Wiki etiquette when making comments first of all. Secondly an explaination has been given on your page. AcePuppy 12:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This comment has been completed and answered on the users page. AcePuppy 21:53, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AcePuppy said: "00:06, 8 August 2006 AcePuppy (Talk | contribs) m (Updated MySpace Member Count & Deleted Zaadz.. non-notable. To Original Poster: You can't base a social networking site just by the website stating it is.)"

Hi AcePuppy, Just want to know why did you remove Zaadz.com when it is a valid social networking site. It's even described as a social networking site in its business model. How would you define a social network? How is it possible that Zaadz.com is not a social network by your definition? Please let me and the rest of the people here know. Please also visit zaadz.com or google "zaadz business model" and see for yourself what Zaadz.com really is. Then you can either add Zaadz.com, or allow me to add it again. Thanks! Coolmel 11:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This comment was answered on the users page. AcePuppy 21:53, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AcePuppy said: "21:47, 18 August 2006 AcePuppy(Deleted Schlogger and Zaadz.com - Both Redlinks making them non-notable.)"

thanks for your response Acepuppy. but you still haven't answered my question on what your definition of a social networking site is. and yes, Zaadz has a wikipedia entry and relevant external links and reviews pertaining it to be as a social networking site. see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaadz -- you also mentioned that "Zaadz.com is non-notable" please qualify what would make it a notable social networking site and i'd be more than happy to provide you with information.

now i request for you to look at the Zaadz wikipedia entry, review it, then please add Zaadz.com on the list yourself, or allow me to add Zaadz.com. thanks.

Comment: Firstly, DO NOT DEMAND. Ok? This comment was answered on the users page. AcePuppy 23:45, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, curious as to why you removed Peertrainer? It has been defined in the social networking space by the NY Times, Business Week, ABC news http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Atio/story?id=1450186

AcePuppy's user page has been updated.

Jeremy Lusk

OK, now I'm confused. I thought he died in Costa Rica. He should have a Costa Rican death certificate or equivalent. He may also have a California death certificate that lists the time of death in Pacific Standard Time, but the Costa Rican one governs. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 04:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Raven Riley

An editor has nominated Raven Riley, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raven Riley (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:04, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AcePuppy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AcePuppy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]