Jump to content

User talk:AccurateJournalist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


May 2021

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hate crime have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:53, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

[edit]

Information icon Hello. In a recent edit to the page Universal basic income, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 15:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Daily Telegraph. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Laplorfill (talk) 20:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Crime in the United Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing. Laplorfill (talk) 20:43, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is often referenced as Wokepedia because of it's bias[1], I'm there for trying to stop that, so that other points of view added. Wikipedia only has left has left wing views and I'm therefore trying to back it up with some right wing sources to make it less biased and so that it contains all the different information. AccurateJournalist (talk) 06:20, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Laplorfill (talk) 06:35, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

[edit]

A bit late, yes. :)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in and edits about COVID-19. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:43, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hi AccurateJournalist! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at 2021 Batley and Spen by-election that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 10:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cashless society have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:18, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021 (3)

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 18:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Belated Welcome

[edit]

A belated welcome because you seem to be a new user and I had to revert some of your edits - here are some useful links for you to find your way around a bit better maybe. Best --Mvbaron (talk) 19:45, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AccurateJournalist, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Mvbaron (talk) 19:43, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 14:09, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, AccurateJournalist! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 14:09, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:AccurateJournalist/sandbox

[edit]

Information icon Hello, AccurateJournalist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:AccurateJournalist/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/05/27/think-bbc-biased-check-wokepedia/
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AccurateJournalist&oldid=1073209929"