User talk:Account Creation Successful

Dummy edits

May I ask, what are you trying to do here? Sro23 (talk) 02:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a copy of the 5th paragraph of:

"U.S. Takes Sharper Tone on Russia’s Role in Syria" nytimes.com, APRIL 12, 2017.

Account Creation Successful, please see WP:Copyright violations --220 of ^Borg 03:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Account Creation Successful do you have any connection to Do it quick (talk · contribs)? --220 of ^Borg 03:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And of course it's another CCCC sock. Why is it this easy to evade blocks and bypass ECP? Sro23 (talk) 04:07, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Hillary Clinton. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 03:49, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:53, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 03:53, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]