User talk:Abstrator

Beach Boys song list

Hi i've seen that you are interested in editing the List of songs by The Beach Boys and I saw your suggestions on the discussion page for this article. I saw your suggestion that the list should be divided into different periods. I was wondering what your opinion is... should it be seperated into categories by decade? (ie: so it has The Beach Boys > 1960's/1970's/1980's/1990's and then Brian Wilson > 1980's/1990's etc...) or what do you think? and I agree there should be a seperate section for unreleased songs etc... I'll be waiting to hear your thoughts, :) Thanks --Sahafan 11:02, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Sahafan

Sorry about the delay. I'm not sure exactly. I think it would be good to make it meaningful, like pre-PetSounds, then to end of Capitol, etc. But it should also take into account what was unreleased or later released from sessions for the periods. It wouls be good to separate post-Brian group. Then there are the bootlegs... I don't have time to tackle it now, though. Abstrator 17:42, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Compulsory

I was reading about the Harvard plagiarist and I found out that they recalled a book once, because in Kay Bailey Hutchinson's introduction, women's issues became a "pubic affair". :) --VKokielov 01:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody here ever remembers what he edits. [1] --VKokielov 23:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Norberg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bob Norberg, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Bob Norberg. hbdragon88 (talk) 23:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Creed

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Marcus Creed, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Marcus Creed. Oo7565 (talk) 03:32, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Abstrator! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 11 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 83 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Volodymyr Kozhukhar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Karsten Andersen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Boris Abalyan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Uwe Mund - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Arvo Volmer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Matthias Kuntzsch - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Aleksandr Dmitriyev (conductor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Melinda O'Neal - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Peter Bay - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Christian Benda - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Edouard Grikurov

The article Edouard Grikurov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Edouard Grikurov – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Blind Willow, Sleeping Woman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stories (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Franco Caracciolo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franco Caracciolo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franco Caracciolo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bob Norberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob Norberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Norberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 21:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Response to suggested deletions

If these articles are deleted, it just means that there will be that much less information in Wikipedia. If someone looks up these names, they won't be there. I could understand the necessity of limiting material for a physical book, but inclusion is one of the advantages of computer databases.

As for the notability of these persons, in these cases distinguished in the field of music, I myself would rather question the importance of the multitudes of articles on every darn video game, or even characters in video games, hardly as notable in my mind as the highly talented human beings someone wants to snuff from the small note they are offered here. I've also seen plenty of scarcely notable musicians from scarcely notable rock bands included here, so the values, as well as the knowledge, of those trying to make these deletions are evident. Still, if someone notes them I'm not going to ask that they be removed. It's information.

It is such actions at Wikipedia that have caused me to largely disinvolve myself from contributing. I don't have time to contribute information that will be deleted, nor do I have time to fight for each such item. Abstrator 21 February 2013

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brady R. Allred for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brady R. Allred is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brady R. Allred (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Java Hurricane 16:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]