User talk:Abrarnakhuda

Abrarnakhuda, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Abrarnakhuda! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Richa101091 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 00:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abrarnakhuda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All the additions are valid, and are put up for the welfare of the celebrity.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abrarnakhuda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read and understood the terms and guidelines to create and edit a wiki page now, which I did not do earlier. I will make sure to not make the same mistake again. I didn't realise I was making a mistake repeatedly and I thank Mike V for blocking me and making me realise my mistakes.

Decline reason:

the mistake which you are making repeatedly is the repeated creation of multiple accounts. Stop doing it. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I apologise for my mistake and won't let that happen again. Please forgive me this time, as I am looking forward to contributing valid and useful information on wiki pages.

Please describe in detail the mistake which you have made. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 23:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The mistake I have made is that I have created multiple accounts and violated the rules of Wikipedia. I am sorry for my mistake and I won't let it happen again.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abrarnakhuda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The mistake I have made is that I have created multiple accounts and violated the rules of Wikipedia. I am sorry for my mistake and I won't let it happen again.

Decline reason:

Given the extensive block history of you and your coworkers, I find that hard to believe. You've already been told about the WP:STANDARDOFFER more than six months ago, but you've shown no sign of stopping your block evasion attempts.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abrarnakhuda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I agree with you. I didn't there is a way to remove my block untill now, when i read the rules and checked the help section. I am back now, ready to contribute to wikipedia and the world, please don't stop me from this.

Decline reason:

You agree with whom, about what? You have posted an unblock request which says "I agree with you" immediately following a message which refers you to the standard offer. However, the standard offer requires you to keep away from editing for at least six months, whereas you have been continually evading your block and editing up to six weeks ago, counting only the sockpuppet accounts that I know of. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|What! I haven't used the account for 6 months, how is it possible that i was editing until six weeks ago?}