User talk:Ablenet

Please do me the favour and stop creating all those new articles in form of stubs. If you don't want to extend the articles, don't start them unless it's necessary. As you can see, the article about the MOVES_Institute has never expanded. Articles should not be just a shorthand definition including a link to an official site. That's why they're usually candidates of speedy deletion: "

Very short articles providing little or no context (e.g., "He is a funny man that has created Factory and the Hacienda. And, by the way, his wife is great."). Limited content is not in itself a reason to delete if there is enough context to allow expansion. Google may help in determining context, though, and allow for the article's expansion.
No content whatsoever. Any article whose contents consist only of links elsewhere (including hyperlinks, category tags and "see also" sections), a rephrasing of the title, and/or attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title." Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion.

Please also consider Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. --RememberMe 17:43, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Changes in America's Army maps

I haven't touched your edits except for the versions due to irrelevancy to the topic. If you keep ignoring me, I'll vote this article for deletion and you know that if you had read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not that this is not going to be accepted as an encyclopedic entry. --RememberMe 16:34, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The article was already there. All I did was re-organazine it! I have not ignored you at all and have responded to your questions. Ablenet 16:38, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't feel put under pressure because of me. I'm not going to spam you with arguments when you don't have time to gather yours. I can understand this, as I won't have time in a few months either because before the sommer terms end I'm going to write my exams which will take my leisure time as well. As long as you don't revert my edits without any tolerance or argumentation, I won't make any further changes or comments this week so relax. There really is no time limit. However, on Monday, I'm expecting that you have had enough time to justify your position, so take your time to do some research and find arguments that speak in favour of your position. I'm sure that you have something on your mind that I'm not yet understanding so please explain what you have imagined during this time and I'm sure we can have an agreement. --RememberMe 21:47, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]