User talk:Ablazev

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ablazev, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jeremjay 24 21:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Cadmium telluride photovoltaics, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Alan (talk) 00:37, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Cadmium telluride photovoltaics. Thank you. Alan (talk) 00:38, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Cadmium telluride photovoltaics. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alan (talk) 00:40, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand that wikipedia is not about truth but about verifiable information. Another note, for your own sake (!!), please do not revert non-trivial edits by regular contributors without discussing the issue on talk pages. Materialscientist (talk) 00:41, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Cadmium telluride photovoltaics. Alan (talk) 00:43, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Cadmium telluride photovoltaics. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Alison ^❤ 01:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please - when your block ends, bring your suggestions to the article talk page first and get consensus to add the information into the article. Constantly reverting to 'your' version isn't the way to ensure it happens - Alison ^❤ 01:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Cadmium telluride photovoltaics. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Alison ^❤ 19:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, you're account is blocked again. After the last time, you immediately went off and repeatedly started adding the same unsourced text to the Cadmium telluride photovoltaics article. When your block ends, please discuss your edits on the article talk page first and work with the other editors until you reach some sort of agreement. The fact that you didn't even try to discuss this is one of the reasons you're account is blocked right now - Alison ^❤ 19:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Risks of cadmium

Hi Ablazev, I appreciate what you're trying to say about the risks of cadmium. Just because cadmium isn't released in a fire, doesn't mean it won't be released in an earthquake, flood, explosion, alien invasion, or whatever. The real problem isn't that, it's WP:NOR. Are you really the only person in the world who thinks that there hasn't been enough testing on Cd safety in CdTe solar cells? Someone somewhere must have written a newspaper article about it, right? You need to find something like that (i.e. a "reliable source"), and include it in a fair and neutral way, based on the sources and not your own opinion, even if your own opinion is correct. Hope this helps. --Steve (talk) 19:52, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]