User talk:Abhyudaya Singh 2023
Welcome
[edit]Hello Abhyudaya Singh 2023 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Rehar, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 18:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rehar. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 18:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Rehar
[edit]Why are you deleting content at Rehar using dishonest edit summaries? Chris Troutman (talk) 18:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you Chris troutman. Also pinging User talk:discospinster, User talk:Usernamekiran, User talk:The Master of Hedgehogs. Abhyuhadaya Singh, if you are just outright lying in edit summaries, nothing good is going to happen, esp. not since you've also been using 2409:40d2::/42 to edit/disrupt the article. That you live there etc. really doesn't mean a lot--what matters is whether you can explain what needs to happen based on reliable secondary sources. I have actually removed the content you were blanking, but I explained why--I hope properly. You need to explain what you are doing, and you need to do that in the right place--in edit summaries and/or on the article talk page, not on the talk pages of three different editors who reverted you, OK? Drmies (talk) 20:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)