User talk:Abhishek Juyal

December 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Daniel Craig has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Daniel Craig was changed by Abhishek Juyal (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906894 on 2017-12-30T15:41:55+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ankur Javeri

Hi, I'm Slatersteven. Abhishek Juyal, thanks for creating Ankur Javeri!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. None of this is sourced.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Slatersteven (talk) 11:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 12:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proving that "data" is "right"

Wikipedia requires that any new information cites at least one professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic source. Even then, if there are more sources saying that that information is wrong, we may not include it.

New articles require more than that. They have to cite at least three sources that are independent of the subject, not affiliated with the subject, but still specifically about the subject. Just because someone or something exists is not good enough, they must be notable. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your sources

Any source with "wiki" in the name is not a professionally-published source. Anyone can contribute to a wiki. The same is true for Facebook pages and Youtube videos.

You need things like newspaper or magazine articles.

You may also need to consider that the person you are writing about simply does not meet our notability guidelines. This is normal, most people do not. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]