User talk:Abcmsaj

Notability of Abcmsaj

A tag has been placed on Abcmsaj, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bonadea 15:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as W24 cr3w, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Marasmusine (talk) 09:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of W24 cr3w

A tag has been placed on W24 cr3w requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DJBullfish (talk) 09:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I thought I would be allowed to do this. Is there a Wikipedia site I can add this to or is it forbidden completely? Thanks.

Speedy deletion of Alex dixon

A tag has been placed on Alex dixon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redmarkviolinist ^{Drop me a line} 14:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article Alex dixon

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Alex dixon. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. ViperSnake151 14:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article Whitescross

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Whitescross. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. --AMRDeuce (talk) 14:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ViperSnake151

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as ViperSnake151, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redmarkviolinist ^{Drop me a line} 14:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article ViperSnake151

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at ViperSnake151. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. (This time it's personal.) ViperSnake151 14:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ViperSnake151

A tag has been placed on ViperSnake151, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. michfan2123 (talk) 14:52, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — Satori Son 14:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abcmsaj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A "friend" got hold of my password from school and used it to create the vandalism pages. I'm sure that if you compare my IP address NOW to what it was when the abusive pages were created, you'll find that they're considerably different (Also our ISP are different)

Decline reason:

Before today this account had created Abcmsaj as well as made these edits. Nothing but vandalism has ever come from this account. Denied. — IrishGuy ^talk 23:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|RESPONSE: The page "Abcmsaj" was not vandalism. It was a page made by myself for me to explain all of the accounts that I own with the username "Abcmsaj." At the time, I didn't know I wasn't allowed to write about individual people, but got the idea from Zezima which is ALSO an account name. I also notice that the page IrishGuy has a User page - THIS is what I wanted to create for Abcmsaj but with my beginner's knowledge, didn't know any better... Please re-view.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

As this was your first block I feel it would be appropriate to reduce it to give you a second chance. However, it is clear that this account has only been used for vandalism. I would hope that you could have a go at making constructive edits, which can be as enjoyable as vandalism. If you do continue to vandalise, the indefinite block will be reinstated immediately.

Request handled by: TigerShark (talk) 01:07, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And your answer for the other edits...? IrishGuy ^talk 00:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the "October 5" article, I was going to link it to my "Abcmsaj" article but I must've waited too long to make that page... I don't remember editting the "The New Deal" page but I use Wikipedia in school and I probably left myself logged in during a History lesson or something ridiculous. Judge what you will. Abcmsaj (talk) 00:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Am I allowed to delete any of this? =\