User talk:Abbyxlee/sandbox/Paris Psalter grec. 139

Abby, I thoroughly enjoyed reading your post as it gave a very detailed account of the Paris Psalter. It was particularly interesting regarding the conspiracy of a copy as you mentioned in one of your concluding paragraphs. I do have a couple of critiques for you that I think would solidify your page. The first is that I would cite more of the sources you used throughout your writing. I would also do away with your quote from the Encyclopedia as throughout the Wikipedia training they frowned upon the use of quotations. However, overall great job!Hglass2 (talk) 04:34, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Chelsie's peer review

Hi nice page so fair, you've got a lot of good details and facts about the Psalter which is awesome. Aside from agreeing with the feedback you've already gotten, I would say perhaps organize the page a little better/differently. The first paragraph was good giving the dimensions and number of pages of the manuscript. The next two it was kind of difficult to read as I felt it kind of jumps from dating the piece as a whole and some history of that, right into talking about a specific page in the manuscript. Other than that and some small sentence structuring you've got a good final page.

Chelsie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C2:1903:DD1:84A8:4C28:C75:4475 (talk) 07:34, 28 November 2017 (UTC)