User talk:Abbaroodle

August 2007

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Harpeth Hills Flying Monkey Marathon. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Oli Filth 01:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Harpeth Hills Flying Monkey Marathon. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please stop adding copyrighted material. Oli Filth 02:04, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Adult stem cell. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tad Lincoln (talk) 18:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spam links

I saw your query at Talk:Stem_cell_treatments asking "Is there a way to block certain external links?" and I agree 100% with your concern. However, that talk page was not really the right place for this query, perhaps the Help desk would be better. There is a bot which picks up and removes links to certain sites which are considered unsuitable for linking. Unfortunately I can't remember what bot it is, but if you can find it, either from the Help desk or by any other means, you could ask whoever maintains it about the possibility of adding the sites you are concerned about. Sorry I can't be more definite, but maybe that will be some help.

JamesBWatson (talk) 20:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two more possibilities: refer the matter to the spam blacklist, or report the matter at theWikiProjectSpam talk page

JamesBWatson (talk) 09:05, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Robert S Lewis moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robert S Lewis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheImaCow (talk) 20:31, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert S Lewis

Hello, Abbaroodle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert S Lewis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]