User talk:Abal126

Yoruba people

Ha. That is not how it works, my friend. It is according to careful and official study of the demographics in Nigeria. Check all the cited references and you will see that the info. is correct. by the way it is not me that put Yoruba people population at that figure rather it was an update by User:Oramfe(whom i believe to be Yoruba like you). The issue is not about how Yoruba population should be but how it actually is, backed up with verifiable source. Please help Wikipedia attain perfection as a source of correct information and not misinformation. Thank you.Ppdallo (talk) 10:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you are saying.But i will advise you to refrain from willful vandalism of Wikipedia contents based on ethnicity and religion. It is about verifiable content and not whims and caprices. If you believe your information is correct, lets move over to Yoruba talk page and discuss this issue.Ppdallo (talk) 09:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abal126, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Abal126! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Islam in Nigeria

Thank you for your message. To confirm, please add the source you mentioned to the article. Regards Denisarona (talk) 14:59, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Back and forth Editing Yoruba people

Apal126 Thanks for the message dropped on my page, What is the back and forth between yourself and user Talisman-white about? Does it gave anything to do with matters of subjective opinions? If Yes...then please, do well to provide sources to back up your edits that are not established facts in order to follow the wikipedia community guidelines my friend. Oramfe

Also, yourself and user Talisman-white should take the issue to the Talk:Yoruba people page to iron it out there... That way, every other page watcher can also follow the order of proceedings.

September 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Nigeria. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
As "Chrislam" is a portmanteau word, the order needs to be Christianity and Islam - please stop reversing them - Arjayay (talk) 10:58, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Yoruba language shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I have seen that you appear to have resolved the issue, but next time I strongly advise you not to resort to edit-warring again, and to discuss controversial changes in the talk page of the relevant article to ensure wider input. Austronesier (talk) 07:37, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to discuss why Ajami should be on an article about all Yorubaland?

Ajami script in Yorubaland never achieved universality, it was only restricted to a very small circle of Yorubas. The standard Yorùbá orthography on the other hand has. Even you use it in everyday life. If you want to talk about the historical use of Ajami in Yorubaland, go to the Yoruba language page and then go under the subsection of Writing systems to make the point there. You can't be transcribing Yorubaland article into Ajami and making that an infobox header. Oramfe (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can we? Abal126 (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We can. -Oluwatalisman (talk) 04:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please don't restore unsourced content, as you did at Charli D'Amelio. Wikipedia goes by reliable sources. Bishonen | tålk 10:53, 10 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at English Americans, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 07:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Yoruba people, you may be blocked from editing. You did the same at Yoruba language as well. Additionally, flat-out lying about adding sources when everybody can see exactly what you've added is just plain dumb. Stop it. – ².O.^Boxing 20:04, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Iwo, Osun, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 09:59, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ede, Osun. - Arjayay (talk) 10:01, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Religion in Nigeria, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 18:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nigeria, you may be blocked from editing. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 07:33, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nigeria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northerner. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 17:51, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Christianity in Nigeria. - Arjayay (talk) 11:22, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Religion in Nigeria, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 11:24, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:27, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]