User talk:AbCaesar

Welcome!

Hello, AbCaesar, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Deependra Tiwari, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! GermanJoe (talk) 10:40, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Deependra Tiwari

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Deependra Tiwari has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GermanJoe (talk) 10:40, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, AbCaesar. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 10:41, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 11:07, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of books written by children or teenagers, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: List of books written by children or teenagers was changed by AbCaesar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916276 on 2020-07-22T16:00:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of books written by children or teenagers. PATH SLOPU 16:31, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for the misbehaviour.

But please, suggest me a solution to add the info.

AbCaesar (talk) 16:35, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikipedia Team,

I did not know the code of conduct. I apologise for the wrong done while being unaware of them.So, I tried making my edit more objective.

Regards,

Deependra Tiwari

AbCaesar (talk) 17:41, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear AbCaesar - you are not allowed to edit articles including information about yourself. This is why other editors have said you are vandalising the List of books written by children or teenagers. I have just reverted the change you made. Please read the Welcome and Conflict of Interest links included in the posts above. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 17:54, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How can I add the piece of information? AbCaesar (talk) 18:50, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but tell me how can I update the info. I am the youngest author in India. I tried mentioning the same info, but editors don't tell me the right way. AbCaesar (talk) 19:08, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't block my account. I am supposed to seek help.My career is on a high. AbCaesar (talk) 19:09, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I have just reverted the most recent change you made to add yourself to List of books written by children or teenagers, which you described as a change to spelling. My feeling is that at this stage you have reached the point where you probably will be blocked. You have not shown any signs of reading and learning from the links other editors have posted. Adding yourself at this stage is repeated vandalism. Tacyarg (talk) 19:58, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at List of books written by children or teenagers. See conversation above. Tacyarg (talk) 19:59, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

Hello, AbCaesar, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Gjbabloo (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:19, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the above advice again. – Thjarkur (talk) 21:58, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 22:02, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gjbabloo, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

– Thjarkur (talk) 22:04, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AbCaesar. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 09:45, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]