User talk:Ab.bekhit

Your article Werner Schmidt (Gynaecology and Obstetrics)

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Werner Schmidt (Gynaecology and Obstetrics) to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Tchaliburton (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Werner Schmidt (Gynaecology and Obstetrics)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Werner Schmidt (Gynaecology and Obstetrics), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.saarbruecker-zeitung.de/saarland/homburg/Homburg;art2802,4966442. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tchaliburton (talk) 00:08, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Werner Schmidt (Gynaecology and Obstetrics)

The article Werner Schmidt (Gynaecology and Obstetrics) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tchaliburton (talk) 01:42, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ab.bekhit, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ab.bekhit! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Werner Schmidt (Gynaecology and Obstetrics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Werner Schmidt (Gynaecology and Obstetrics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werner Schmidt (Gynaecology and Obstetrics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Werner Schmidt (Gynaecology and Obstetrics), you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:55, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Werner Schmidt (Gynaecology and Obstetrics). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may not remove Articles for deletion notices from any article until the matter has been decided. Do not do so again. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn Sie diese Nachrichten in Englisch nicht verstehen, dann wenden Sie sich bitte beschränken Sie sich auf die Bearbeitung in der deutschen Wikipedia. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Werner Schmidt (Gynaecology and Obstetrics)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Werner Schmidt (Gynaecology and Obstetrics) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.pfaelzischer-merkur.de/saarpfalz/homburg/Homburg-Professor-Werner-Schmidt-feiert-diesen-Samstag-70-Geburtstag;art27550,4966421. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tchaliburton (talk) 19:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ab.bekhit: I have removed the speedy deletion template. However, with this edit, you removed the Articles for deletion template and you also replaced the text with German copied from one of the newspaper articles. Do not copy text! It is a legal violation. I am puzzled that you have not created this article on the German Wikipedia. The different-language Wikipedias are independent; I note that when you recreated the article, you did so in English. Thank you for that, but we do have a German Wikipedia also. However, there too, you must not copy.

You should contribute to the deletion discussion about the article if you want it to be kept. If it is deleted as a result of the discussion, it will be very difficult to make an article about him again without it being deleted. The discussion is taking place here and will last for one week, possibly longer. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your recent edits to the article because the references do not support the claim. If you can find a reference saying that he was one of the first to recommend using prostoglandins, please add it. Links to his publications are also not very useful, because of course as an academic he will have publications. The special guidelines on notability for academics require the publications to be influential in the field. The easiest way to show that is to cite an academic paper, book, or newspaper saying so. Again, I recommend that you take part in the deletion discussion. Say why you believe the article should be kept! Yngvadottir (talk) 20:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]