User talk:AxGRvS

Welcome!

Hello, Aaron27gg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Cambalachero (talk) 22:06, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm TheMesquito. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to List of Total Drama Action episodes, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheMesquito (talk) 20:35, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!

   Thank you for correcting the specials on the regular show episode tables! I have wanted that correction so long but no one would let me do it! Thank You! 
          
                                                                                                         -Thankyou123  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thankyou123 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, AxGRvS. You have new messages at Talk:List of The Marvelous Misadventures of Flapjack episodes.
Message added 20:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent edits look to me like you are unilaterally redefining what constitutes an episode, yet you've not explained anything in your edit summaries, or opened a discussion before making such a comprehensive and bold change. Looking forward to your thoughts. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Phineas and Ferb (season 4). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Diffs: 3 edits, 4 edits Again, you are unilaterally redefining what an episode is, without discussion. Your edits have been reverted. Per WP:BRD, your recourse is to open a discussion on the article's talk page and achieve a consensus for the changes. If you submit the content again, it will be considered clear vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Phineas and Ferb (season 4). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Amortias (T)(C) 20:58, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. [1][2] So far, at three articles that I am aware of, you have attempted to redefine what constitutes an episode. With regard to your most recent edits, since you neither have consensus to make these changes, nor have you attempted to discuss any of these changes, they are being considered disruptive. Do not change this information without first achieving consensus at Talk:The Fairly OddParents. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Aaron27gg, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to The Fairly OddParents (season 9) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Diffs: [3] The embedded notes that you replaced tell you explicitly not to copy content from other sources. Some of the summaries you submitted are clearly copied, for example from here Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:30, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Aaron27gg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Aaron27gg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In other media

In general the infoboxes should only include works where the character was the main focus. Not everything they've been in.★Trekker (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aaron27gg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aaron27gg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Four, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- /Alex/₂₁ 15:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Four, you may be blocked from editing. -- /Alex/₂₁ 15:37, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Fast & Furious 9, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 09:49, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hawkeye (upcoming TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 00:33, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Hawkeye (upcoming TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — YoungForever^(talk) 01:13, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Justice League (film) into Zack Snyder's Justice League. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zack Snyder's Justice League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Kent. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marvel Cinematic Universe Good Article Reassessment

Marvel Cinematic Universe, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 04:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marvel Cinematic Universe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spider-Man trilogy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weird signature name change

This IP changed your signature to theirs here. Do you have anything to do with this? Are you editing Wikipedia both as a named editor and as an IP? —El Millo (talk) 19:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MCU Phases and Cast

Regarding your recent edits on the MCU phase articles, a character who first appeared in one franchise (ie Cassie Lang and Adam Warlock) are generally not to be noted when they return, even if an actor change (Lang) or finally being cast (Warlock). because it is primarily from that franchise. Not including all of the Avengers cast members in Civil War's entry is due to it being an ensemble and noting all of them would be overly excessive, plus they're already listed in the cast & characters table near the bottom of the Phase Three article. Ford is noted for Cap 4 because it is a recasting of a role that originated from a different sub-franchise in the MCU (TIH) and not from the Cap films (though Hurt played Ross in Civil War, it is a notably change given the role originated from a non-Cap film). I hope this explains it better. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:53, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Trailblazer101 Thanks for taking your time in explaining this. Okay, I can understand the Ross situation, although, based on this, we shouldn't also note the change of actress for Cassie Lang in Endgame? Also I think there's a mention of the recast of James Rhodes in the Phase One article, although I can't remember if it is on the second paragraph. Regarding the ensemble films, I can understand it for Infinity War and Endgame, where there are a lot of returning actors. But in the case of Age of Ultron there are only four (Cheadle, Mackie, Atwell, and Elba, as others have already appeared in the Avengers franchise) and in Civil War there are seven (Cheadle, Renner, Olsen, Bettany, Rudd, Hurt, and Slattery, as Downey is mentioned above and others like Johansson and Mackie previously appeared in the Cap franchise). One thing that was strange to me was that only Hurt was previously mentioned. AxGRvS (talk) 18:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cassie Lang in Endgame was the first appearance of the character being aged up, akin to Monica Rambeau in WandaVision, so noting her for Endgame at the Phase Three article should be included. With that considered, it may actually be worth including Newton taking on the role for Quantumania. As for the AoU and CW cast, the AoU four should be noted even though they weren't as major given it's their first Avengers appearance. The CW rationale you mentioned would also fall into place with this, and I agree, only mentioning Hurt for it is a bit strange. I would suggest having @Favre1fan93 weigh in on this before making further edits on the matter. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:11, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I noted in my edit summary, listing all the ensemble cast for those films (the Avengers ones plus CW) creates some WP:UNDUE given these sections are just meant to provide quick overviews for readers. Regarding Hurt in the CW section, I believe that was done given his reprisal from TIH, which had largely been ignored up until that point in the MCU. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Favre1fan93 Okay, I agree with @Trailblazer101 on keeping Cassie Lang both in Endgame and Quantumania (the Monica Rambeau example is an excellent comparison) as well as keeping the AoU four returning actors (as they are not many like Infinity War/Endgame). For the CW case, keeping only Hurt seems a bit arbitrary, so we can remove the Avengers in that film (although I still think they should be mentioned) and keeping Hurt and Slattery, which are not Avenger characters. And another thing that was reverted was the mention of Marisa Tomei's Aunt May returning from Civil War in Homecoming, which I think is strange considering John Kani's T'Chaka is mentioned in Black Panther as a reprisal. AxGRvS (talk) 20:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Three, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Sadler.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Marvel Cinematic Universe into Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Three. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying material and not sourcing it

This is in conjunction with the above section. You've been on Wikipedia long enough and active enough that you know things need to be sourced. Adding in the material you did at the MCU Phase Two and Three articles carte blanche without sourcing doesn't fly. If you're going to do that, please add the sources for it too. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Trailblazer101 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thunderbolt Ross

Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with this edit to Thunderbolt Ross. I know you don't edit here that often, but since you've accumulated over 3,200 edits here since 2013, you should know by now that Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, as described here. For now, don't worry about the Ross passage you added, because as I added a citation for it. In the future, please remember to add material only when it is accompanied by such citations. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

that edit is more than 2 months old and a reliable source was added shortly after AxGRvS (talk) 18:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited El encargado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Aráoz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]