User talk:Aardvark31

Welcome!

Hello, Aardvark31, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nsaa (talk) 15:52, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Modern Whig Party

They have discuussed it on the forums.

I find your conclusion that veterans wouldn't be for freethought simply because the symbol of it is a pansy. Why would veterans not be for freethought and freewill?

Also, the MWP logo will always be the owl. Simply including another ideology that may have it's own symbol won't cahnge the party's logo.

Ok, but I am going to add Centrism. That is mentioned many times in on the Modern Whig website.

Just so you know, I'm adding "Middle Ground" to the MWP ideology which is mentioned numerous times on their website.

Who tried to change the MWP colors from Blue and Buff to Blue and Red?

—Preceding unsigned comment added by ApocalypseNow115 (talk • contribs) 04:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Patent Process (United States)

A tag has been placed on Patent Process (United States), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 17:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the {{hangon}} tag, let's try and help the author clean this article up rather than delete it outright. --Jakebathman (talk) 17:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced the speedy deletion tag with a Prod tag to give the author some time to clean up the article.--Jakebathman (talk) 17:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Patent Process (United States)

I have nominated Patent Process (United States), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patent Process (United States). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 00:14, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Reverse domain hijacking

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Reverse domain hijacking, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.aplegal.com/articles/article2.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Reverse domain hijacking and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Reverse domain hijacking with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Reverse domain hijacking.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Reverse domain hijacking saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to your note at the article's talk page, we need external verification of said permission by one of the processes set out above. As indicated, please make a note at the article's talk page when that verification is supplied, but please do not edit the article or remove the "copyright template" before that verification is confirmed. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As it has now been more than seven days and the OTRS ticket has not been supplied for Reverse domain hijacking, I am restoring to the last verifiably clean. If there were problems with your permission, you should have been notified by a member of the communications committee in response to your e-mail. If you have heard nothing, perhaps your original correspondence was lost. Please consider resending that. If permission is verified through OTRS, then the material can be restored. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Florida Whig Party

An article that you have been involved in editing, Florida Whig Party, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florida Whig Party (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 18:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul C. McKain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul C. McKain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul C. McKain until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 00:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Modern Whig Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Modern Whig Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modern Whig Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Otr500 (talk) 15:12, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]