User talk:Aanonymiss

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aanonymiss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

On March 5, 2024 at approximately 12:30 PM, the user named "SWATJester" accused me of harassing him through direct messages on his LinkedIn. This is false. I am starting to believe that this individual is mentally unstable and accusing me of harassing him offsite. I have done no such thing, I have put many hours into contributing to Wikipedia articles in my freetime. Aanonymiss (talk) 17:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks are not considered and will result in loss of talk page access. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Eco Yosemite Park for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eco Yosemite Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eco Yosemite Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aanonymiss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Wikipedia, will you please unban my Wikipedia account? I've put so much time and effort into contributing to Wikipedia. Paul R. Houston I created this article.
Julie S. Cabus I created this article.
Top Ships Inc I created this article.
Castor Maritime I created this article.
Rewards For Justice I added the logo for the Rewards for Justice Program

Decline reason:

The merits of your contributions are not the issue; your off wiki actions are. I suggest that you consider the offer of the blocking admin below; if you decide to do as they request, I will remove the block on their behalf. 331dot (talk) 13:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'd be willing to lift the block on this user if they agree to apologize for their egregious personal attacks in the unblock request below, and to abide by the reliable sourcing guidelines in the future, with the understanding that if they do not the block will be reinstated due to their demonstrated history of failing to represent their edits accurately, subtle vandalism, original research, and a general lack of editing competency. I'm traveling and will have limited internet access between now and May 27th, so I may be slow to respond to inquiries -- if the reviewing admin wishes to address the unblock request before then, they should do whatever they feel is appropriate without need to consult me. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 05:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC) <[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Aanonymiss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Wikipedia Community and SWATJester, thank you for your message. Firstly, it is a great honor and huge privilege to be apart or a community that truly cares about providing reliable and verifiable Encyclopedia content through citations and sources. I've learned valuable life lesson skills and aim to improve myself as to become a better Wikipedia editor. I would like to issue a public apology to the Wikipedia community for my unprofessional behavior of my Wiki actions and to SWATJester. I will abide to the reliable sourcing guidelines in the future and do extensive research before contributing to any Wikipedia article. I am willing to take full responsibility for my actions and I will admit that it was wrong of me. I hope to make reprimands and contribute to the community by joining the Counter-Vandalism Unit and help clean Wikipedia of subtle vandalism.

Accept reason:

Based on Yamla's clean report below, and the promises made in the unblock request, I'll accept this and unblock your account. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CHECKUSER data shows no evidence of block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 21:49, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You just got unblocked, tread carefully please

Aanonymiss -- you just got unblocked a couple of weeks ago and you've already begun making problematic edits. You recently mangled the ledes of the Ned Price, Central Intelligence Agency, and United States European Command articles, and at least in a couple of cases your edits were done apparently with the intent of shoehorning in loosely related content that you've contributed to relating to Rewards For Justice. Please tread more carefully in the future; one of the conditions of being unblocked was that you would demonstrate a higher degree of editing competency -- this isn't it. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rewards for Justice Program, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]