User talk:Aaa11769

July 2020

Hello, I'm Prahlad balaji. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 21:36, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I did explain, in one of them, sorry, but anyway the information about the Guardians of the Galaxy part is wrong, it was confirmed that it is not set in the universe of Ultimate Spider-Man, and there is no Marvel Animated Universe block, it was just called Marvel Universe. Can you please look into it, you can find sources and information about the subject on Marvel database, page Earth-17628. Aaa11769 (talk) 21:40, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:BURDEN. The responsibility to provide the sources is on the editor who adds the material (in this case, not me but you). ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 21:44, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's just that I just joined, I don't really know how to do that. Aaa11769 (talk) 21:45, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I figured it out, I added the source of where it was stated that Guardians is not part of Ultimate Spider-Man and Avengers Assemble. Aaa11769 (talk) 22:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man (2017 TV series)

The article has problems and I welcome you to try and improve it but you need to add reviews that support your points, not remove the only actual reference in that section. -- 109.79.176.62 (talk) 04:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that WP:USERGENERATED content such as from other wikis or from web polls are not allowed, that includes user votes from IMDB which MOS:TVRECEPTION expressly prohibits.
Please also note WP:RELTIME and do not use the word "currently", if needed specify {{As of}} when, but an encyclopedia should not say "currently" or "recently". -- 109.79.176.62 (talk) 04:26, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unaware of that, sorry. Thanks for the info. Aaa11769 (talk) 04:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One last hint: 3 reviews -- 109.79.176.62 (talk) 05:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you wanting me to add that to the page? Aaa11769 (talk) 05:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Your recent editing history at Spider-Man (2017 TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Aaa11769 reported by User:The4lines (Result: ). Thank you. Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(You Asked?) (What I have Done.)} 16:35, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]