Jump to content

User talk:A vision of it

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, A vision of it, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 01:29, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

[edit]

It may not have been your intention, but you removed material with this edit to Limp Bizkit. When removing material in this manner please either discuss the matter on the article's talk page first, or at least explain your reasons in the edit summary. Your edit has been reverted for now. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If a band/artist has their own discography article, then they should only have studio albums listed on their main article. See most band articles with seperate discographies, such as any featured band article. There is no need to discuss my removal on the Limb Bizkit article because "studio-only" is common practice on the rest of Wikipedia. A vision of it (talk) 22:31, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An edit summary to that effect might have been helpful. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

[edit]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Stakk Attakk. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 01:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to remove a redirect from the article. I didn't know the process too well, so I'm sorry about that action. I just read up on the redirect guidelines and I'm currently trying to do it the proper way. A vision of it (talk) 02:30, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please show something besides your claim that dictates that only studio albums should be listed in the main article. A policy, a music article standard, a style guideline, a featured article standard criteria, a good article standard criteria, or even a music project guideline. Anything to support that only studio albums should be listed in the main article. You must have something policy or standard based to go around making such content changes in articles and basing it on "format". This is a good article. Music projects had nothing to do with that achievement or its retaining that status when it was relisted. Show me anything other than your POV that only studio articles should be listed in a main article. Mariah Carey#Discography would undermine any contention that only studio release albums would be listed in a main article. That is a featured article. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:07, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]