Jump to content

User talk:A user of english wiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2024

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A user of english wiki (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I ensure the block is no longer necessary as if I get unblocked I won't use this account for vandalism. @Yamla please review this block as soon as possibleA user of english wiki (talk) 14:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have independently confirmed the checkuser findings. PhilKnight (talk) 14:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A user of english wiki (talk) 14:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I should have done this from the start. TPA revoked. If any passing admin wants to chat with me privately on this to confirm, please do so. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

@CanonNi By the way, you're not an Admin, so how do you find the evidence that this is a sockpuppet? A user of english wiki (talk) 14:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What a bizarre statement. Being an admin isn't even generally helpful in determining if someone is a sockpuppet. --Yamla (talk) 15:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]