User talk:A thrush

Archives

test

I'm a bridge Sonoma's bridge (talk) 17:58, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Chester County Courthouse (Pennsylvania)

Hello! Your submission of Chester County Courthouse (Pennsylvania) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 21:13, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amy's Baking Company

The article Amy's Baking Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable, self-promotion. This is a small restaurant benefitting from its post-Ramsay 15 minutes of fame and the bad behavior of its owners. Nothing remotely encyclopedic about it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmargi (talk) 04:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC) Timestamp: 20130516043911 04:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amy's Baking Company for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amy's Baking Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy's Baking Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just giving you a head's up on this in case you have any input, since you created the redirect. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:UK Conservative Party. –Davey2010^Talk 15:25, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop restoring the Labour ad - this could get you blocked. Alakzi (talk) 15:26, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because it is believed to have been compromised. Note that edits to your user talk page might not indicate that you have regained control of your account. If your privileges to e-mail and edit your user talk page have been revoked, contact ArbCom at arbcom-appeals-enlists.wikimedia.org. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]