User talk:A big shitbag

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A big shitbag (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

slamgoat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

this nightmare has to end today, i feel ashamed,i learned my lesson,i had no clues that i could get banned for using several accounts as the ONLY way to get unblocked on this strict website,i need one more chance

Decline reason:

Back in September you said you would not use any more sockpuppets, but you have continued to do so. Why should we think you have changed now? Also, you have previously been asked for a full list of all the accounts you have used, and have failed to do so. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:35, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A big shitbag (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

slamgoat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

i forgot that i wasnt gonna use any more sockpuppets again shortly after october started

Decline reason:

That's astoundingly unconvincing. Kuru (talk) 17:49, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A big shitbag (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

slamgoat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

i promise i will create an account for legimate reasons... waiting three months just to create another account is about as much fun as getting stiches

Decline reason:

Creating another account will be a further example of block-evading sockpuppetry, and no-one has said you can that in three months or at any other time. You have still failed to list the other accounts you have used, although requested to do so. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-un|slamgoat|reason= if you didnt notice, i did create a list of accounts when you banned me from editing [[user talk:Panderichthys4144|my user talk page]] when i did provide a list of damn accounts!}}

That list, which I concede I did not notice, was created late September on the talk page of your master account and is seriously incomplete. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:44, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

then i used user:aaqwea create an attack page about that douchebag that prevented me from editing for an unbearably long time to attempt to convince him to unblock me! you administrators certainly dont know the meaning of freedom!if you are kind enough to unblock me or once my block expires,im talkin that cold-hearted bastard down!

Enough playtime. Personal attacks and silly-named accounts do not in any way indicate you are here to contribute. You've had your laughs; move on. Kuru (talk) 20:07, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]